<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T20:31:06Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/112473" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/112473</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:53:53Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Brian L. Wardle.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Lidston, Dale L. (Dale Leigh)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2017-12-05T19:14:23Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2017-12-05T19:14:23Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2017</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2017</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/112473</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">1011355580</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (pages 199-215).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">In an effort to fully understand the contribution of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) to strength and toughness enhancement in hierarchical nanoengineered composites, particularly steady state Mode I fracture toughness, RTM6 and EPON 862/W epoxy based vertically-aligned carbon nanotube (A-CNT) polymer nanocomposites (A-PNCs) are manufactured. These A-PNCs can be tested to isolate structure-property relationships between the polymer matrix and the A-CNTs without the presence of the micro-scale fibers. Additionally, A-CNT volume fraction can be varied via a densification process to realize 1-30% volume fraction (vf.%) A-PNCs. An investigation of the Mode I initiation fracture toughness via single edge notch beam (SENB) testing of A-PNCs with 1-5 vf.% uniaxially densified A-CNT forests finds that RTM6 baseline and A-PNC samples have a KIc,i of ~ 1 MPa-m¹/², with the exception of 1 vf.% having 1.33 ± 0.09 MPa-m¹/², which needs to be further explored due to process-structure questions of specimen quality. No statistically significant change is observed in EPON 862/W A-PNCs at 1-5 vf.% over baseline specimens having a KIc,i of 1.49 ± 0.06 MPa-m¹/² , indicating that A-CNTs do not offer any toughening at initiation in this system. Scanning electron microscopy of the fracture surface for both A-PNC systems reveals that &lt; 10% of the A-CNTs available are engaged during crack bridging, i.e., in a 5 vf.% A-PNC specimen, at most 0.5 vf.% of the A-CNTs are engaged during fracture, and pull-out from the matrix is less than 1 pm. Thus, the pullout and debonding toughening contribution offered by the A-CNTs is expected and measured to be negligible. It is possible that these A-CNTs may offer steady-state toughening, however, results are not achieved due to limitations in specimen size and geometry. While changes in Mode I initiation toughness are not observed, significant changes in properties from both quasi-static and dynamic nanoindentation testing are observed. The A-CNT alignment confers a non-isotropic mechanical response when quasi-statically tested with A-CNTs parallel or perpendicular to the indentation load. An ~ 270% modulus increase over baseline for the 30 vf.% EPON 862/W A-PNC parallel configuration and a ~ 140% increase in the perpendicular configuration, are observed and dynamic nanoindentation supports this finding with, e.g., a storage modulus increase of ~ 200% in the parallel orientation. RTM6 A-PNCs show less of an increase in indentation modulus (~ 33% in 10 vf.% specimens in the parallel direction) over baseline when compared to those of EPON 862/W, likely due to the relatively stiff RTM6 (modulus is ~ 1.5x larger than EPON 862/W) and therefore there is a relatively smaller A-CNT stiffness contribution. Looking forward, the A-CNTs used in this work are noted to be unmodified/as-grown, and the A-CNT fracture results highlight the need for modifying the A-CNTs towards increased A-CNT strength (defect density reduction), and/or reducing the strength of the CNT-polymer interface, to increase A-CNT toughness contribution further.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Dale L. Lidston.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">215 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Aeronautics and Astronautics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Synthesis, characterization, and mode I fracture toughness of aligned carbon nanotube polymer matrix nanocomposites</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="49b93118-3150-4d4a-9f2f-1455c6f7c7b2">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Synthesis, characterization, and mode I fracture toughness of aligned carbon nanotube polymer matrix nanocomposites&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2017&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Lidston, Dale L. (Dale Leigh)&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Aeronautics and Astronautics.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>In an effort to fully understand the contribution of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) to strength and toughness enhancement in hierarchical nanoengineered composites, particularly steady state Mode I fracture toughness, RTM6 and EPON 862/W epoxy based vertically-aligned carbon nanotube (A-CNT) polymer nanocomposites (A-PNCs) are manufactured. These A-PNCs can be tested to isolate structure-property relationships between the polymer matrix and the A-CNTs without the presence of the micro-scale fibers. Additionally, A-CNT volume fraction can be varied via a densification process to realize 1-30% volume fraction (vf.%) A-PNCs. An investigation of the Mode I initiation fracture toughness via single edge notch beam (SENB) testing of A-PNCs with 1-5 vf.% uniaxially densified A-CNT forests finds that RTM6 baseline and A-PNC samples have a KIc,i of ~ 1 MPa-m¹/², with the exception of 1 vf.% having 1.33 ± 0.09 MPa-m¹/², which needs to be further explored due to process-structure questions of specimen quality. No statistically significant change is observed in EPON 862/W A-PNCs at 1-5 vf.% over baseline specimens having a KIc,i of 1.49 ± 0.06 MPa-m¹/² , indicating that A-CNTs do not offer any toughening at initiation in this system. Scanning electron microscopy of the fracture surface for both A-PNC systems reveals that &amp;lt; 10% of the A-CNTs available are engaged during crack bridging, i.e., in a 5 vf.% A-PNC specimen, at most 0.5 vf.% of the A-CNTs are engaged during fracture, and pull-out from the matrix is less than 1 pm. Thus, the pullout and debonding toughening contribution offered by the A-CNTs is expected and measured to be negligible. It is possible that these A-CNTs may offer steady-state toughening, however, results are not achieved due to limitations in specimen size and geometry. While changes in Mode I initiation toughness are not observed, significant changes in properties from both quasi-static and dynamic nanoindentation testing are observed. The A-CNT alignment confers a non-isotropic mechanical response when quasi-statically tested with A-CNTs parallel or perpendicular to the indentation load. An ~ 270% modulus increase over baseline for the 30 vf.% EPON 862/W A-PNC parallel configuration and a ~ 140% increase in the perpendicular configuration, are observed and dynamic nanoindentation supports this finding with, e.g., a storage modulus increase of ~ 200% in the parallel orientation. RTM6 A-PNCs show less of an increase in indentation modulus (~ 33% in 10 vf.% specimens in the parallel direction) over baseline when compared to those of EPON 862/W, likely due to the relatively stiff RTM6 (modulus is ~ 1.5x larger than EPON 862/W) and therefore there is a relatively smaller A-CNT stiffness contribution. Looking forward, the A-CNTs used in this work are noted to be unmodified/as-grown, and the A-CNT fracture results highlight the need for modifying the A-CNTs towards increased A-CNT strength (defect density reduction), and/or reducing the strength of the CNT-polymer interface, to increase A-CNT toughness contribution further.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>