<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T23:43:40Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/114317" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/114317</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:53:59Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131024</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Bradford H. Hager.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Peters, Teresa Baker, 1981-</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2018-03-27T14:17:14Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2018-03-27T14:17:14Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2003</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2003</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/114317</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">1028737657</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: S.B., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, 2003.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (page 22).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">Geologic deformation in three dimensions can be modeled using finite element analysis. In choosing the elements used to solve a model it is important to consider the accuracy of the solution and the computational intensity. The results for models using six element types and six element side lengths are compared for the accuracy of the displacements calculated by the solution and the number of nodes required, as a proxy for computational intensity. Elements that allow higher order solutions are much more accurate than elements that only allow linear interpolation of the stresses and displacements between nodes; however the number of nodes required is five times greater. Free-form meshes do not significantly improve the performance of tetrahedra for the models tested, but could be accurate enough to model curved problem geometries. Comparisons for other models, such as a thrust fault, can be made using a twodimensional simplification of the three-dimensional problem. If three-dimensional comparisons are required it is important to choose a model that has an analytical solution.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Teresa Baker.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.B.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">22 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Finite element comparison for a geologically motivated benchmark</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="d81b7020-0799-493e-ad57-467df49245d8">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Finite element comparison for a geologically motivated benchmark&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2003&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Peters, Teresa Baker, 1981-&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>Geologic deformation in three dimensions can be modeled using finite element analysis. In choosing the elements used to solve a model it is important to consider the accuracy of the solution and the computational intensity. The results for models using six element types and six element side lengths are compared for the accuracy of the displacements calculated by the solution and the number of nodes required, as a proxy for computational intensity. Elements that allow higher order solutions are much more accurate than elements that only allow linear interpolation of the stresses and displacements between nodes; however the number of nodes required is five times greater. Free-form meshes do not significantly improve the performance of tetrahedra for the models tested, but could be accurate enough to model curved problem geometries. Comparisons for other models, such as a thrust fault, can be made using a twodimensional simplification of the three-dimensional problem. If three-dimensional comparisons are required it is important to choose a model that has an analytical solution.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>