<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T14:53:10Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/118731" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/118731</identifier><datestamp>2026-06-16T18:14:53Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131022</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Warren Hoburg.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Nill, Scott T. (Scott Thomas)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2018-10-22T18:46:48Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2018-10-22T18:46:48Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2018</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2018</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118731</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">1057268026</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2018.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (pages 108-110).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">The introduction of large, composite transport aircraft, such as the Airbus A350 and the Boeing 787, has been fraught with billions of dollars of production cost overruns. This research develops a novel approach to manufacturing cost modeling during the conceptual design phase using Geometric Programming (GP). A new formulation of a closed queuing network as a GP is presented to capture the crucial cost trade-offs between capacity and inventory. Additionally, GP models are presented for modeling unit processes in composite manufacturing and for modeling cost accounting metrics. Applied to the challenges of conceptual design for composite aircraft, the cost models can be used as a tool to help inform decisions about which manufacturing process to use and what type of supply chain should be deployed. The special sensitivity-analysis properties of the GP solutions can be exploited to explain how different aspects of the design drive manufacturing costs and to find highly sensitive areas of the trade-space that would have a large impact on cost if the design needed to be altered. The framework is demonstrated for fast but informative analyses of process trade-offs in composite fuselage fabrication.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Scott T. Nill.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">Ph.D.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">126 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Mechanical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Aerospace composite manufacturing cost models as geometric programs</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="f97176e4-80e0-4161-95a4-6e174394f3f3">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Aerospace composite manufacturing cost models as geometric programs&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2018&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Nill, Scott T. (Scott Thomas)&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Mechanical Engineering.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>The introduction of large, composite transport aircraft, such as the Airbus A350 and the Boeing 787, has been fraught with billions of dollars of production cost overruns. This research develops a novel approach to manufacturing cost modeling during the conceptual design phase using Geometric Programming (GP). A new formulation of a closed queuing network as a GP is presented to capture the crucial cost trade-offs between capacity and inventory. Additionally, GP models are presented for modeling unit processes in composite manufacturing and for modeling cost accounting metrics. Applied to the challenges of conceptual design for composite aircraft, the cost models can be used as a tool to help inform decisions about which manufacturing process to use and what type of supply chain should be deployed. The special sensitivity-analysis properties of the GP solutions can be exploited to explain how different aspects of the design drive manufacturing costs and to find highly sensitive areas of the trade-space that would have a large impact on cost if the design needed to be altered. The framework is demonstrated for fast but informative analyses of process trade-offs in composite fuselage fabrication.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>