<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T04:59:26Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/119908" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/119908</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:53:53Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Steven R. Hall and Matthew J. Weinstein.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Kapolka, Tyler J. (Tyler Joseph)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2019-01-11T15:05:29Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2019-01-11T15:05:29Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2018</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2018</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/119908</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">1080638998</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">This electronic version was submitted by the student author.  The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged student-submitted from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (pages 121-123).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">An overview is presented for two methods of incorporating the covariance in an optimal control problem. Including the covariance in the optimal control problem can be beneficial in the field of navigation where it is desirable to design trajectories which either minimize navigation error or maximize observability for instrument calibration. The full state collocation method uses Legendre Gauss Radau collocation to discretize the deterministic states and controls as well as the unique elements of the covariance matrix. The problem is then transcribed to a nonlinear progamming problem (NLP) and is solved with an NLP solver. This method, however, results in problems with many constraints and variables, which is computationally expensive. The partial state collocation method, the main focus of this thesis, collocates the deterministic states and controls but uses a shooting method to incorporate the covariance matrix. The problem is then transcribed to a nonlinear programming problem, which has fewer constraints and variables than the full state collocation method. Both of these methods are demonstrated by solving for the trajectory that minimizes the final position uncertainty for a spacecraft reentering Earth's atmosphere. The problem is tested with different sized covariance matrices, which shows how the time it takes to solve the problem increases as the covariance matrix increases in size. The partial state collocation method is generally faster and converges in fewer NLP iterations than the full state collocation method. As the covariance matrix increases in size, the time it takes to solve the problem increases at a smaller rate for the partial state collocation method.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Tyler J. Kapolka.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">123 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Aeronautics and Astronautics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">A partial state collocation method for covariance optimal control</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="0e19eb89-1bad-45bb-adad-7e4f5be73a74">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>A partial state collocation method for covariance optimal control&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2018&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Kapolka, Tyler J. (Tyler Joseph)&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Aeronautics and Astronautics.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract&gt;An overview is presented for two methods of incorporating the covariance in an optimal control problem. Including the covariance in the optimal control problem can be beneficial in the field of navigation where it is desirable to design trajectories which either minimize navigation error or maximize observability for instrument calibration. The full state collocation method uses Legendre Gauss Radau collocation to discretize the deterministic states and controls as well as the unique elements of the covariance matrix. The problem is then transcribed to a nonlinear progamming problem (NLP) and is solved with an NLP solver. This method, however, results in problems with many constraints and variables, which is computationally expensive. The partial state collocation method, the main focus of this thesis, collocates the deterministic states and controls but uses a shooting method to incorporate the covariance matrix. The problem is then transcribed to a nonlinear programming problem, which has fewer constraints and variables than the full state collocation method. Both of these methods are demonstrated by solving for the trajectory that minimizes the final position uncertainty for a spacecraft reentering Earth&amp;apos;s atmosphere. The problem is tested with different sized covariance matrices, which shows how the time it takes to solve the problem increases as the covariance matrix increases in size. The partial state collocation method is generally faster and converges in fewer NLP iterations than the full state collocation method. As the covariance matrix increases in size, the time it takes to solve the problem increases at a smaller rate for the partial state collocation method.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>