2026-09-19T13:44:25Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/1208802026-06-16T18:15:56Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131022
Harriet Ritvo.
Shapiro, Ryan Noah
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Program in Science, Technology and Society.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Program in Science, Technology and Society
2019-03-11T19:35:52Z
2019-03-11T19:35:52Z
2018
2018
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/120880
1088722277
Thesis: Ph. D. in History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology and Society (HASTS), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Program in Science, Technology and Society, 2018.
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references.
The rhetoric and apparatus of national security have played critical roles in American controversies over animal and human experimentation from the dawn of the Twentieth Century to today's "War on Terror." Drawing on archival and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) research, this dissertation traces how American partisans in the enduring vivisection controversy have sought to mobilize national security concerns to tar their domestic political adversaries as enemy agents of foreign enemies from the Kaiser and Hitler to Stalin and Al-Qaeda. Further, this study explores how these efforts have intersected with issues of gender, slavery, and the pathologizing of political dissent, as well as campaigns for the absolute freedom of research, the functioning of Nazism and the Holocaust in the American political imagination, civil liberties in the Post-9/11 world, and ongoing debates over animal rights, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and domestic terrorism.
by Ryan Noah Shapiro.
Ph.D. in History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology and Society (HASTS)
641 pages
eng
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Program in Science, Technology and Society.
Bodies at war : National Security in American controversies over animal & human experimentation from WWI to the War on Terror
National Security in American controversies over animal & human experimentation from WWI to the War on Terror
Thesis
application/pdf
false
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="928ea4aa-d8cd-4c97-9030-a9c6122f446e">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Language>eng</Language>
<Title>Bodies at war : National Security in American controversies over animal & human experimentation from WWI to the War on Terror</Title>
<Subtitle>National Security in American controversies over animal & human experimentation from WWI to the War on Terror</Subtitle>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>2018</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Shapiro, Ryan Noah</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License>
<Keyword>Program in Science, Technology and Society.</Keyword>
<Abstract>The rhetoric and apparatus of national security have played critical roles in American controversies over animal and human experimentation from the dawn of the Twentieth Century to today's "War on Terror." Drawing on archival and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) research, this dissertation traces how American partisans in the enduring vivisection controversy have sought to mobilize national security concerns to tar their domestic political adversaries as enemy agents of foreign enemies from the Kaiser and Hitler to Stalin and Al-Qaeda. Further, this study explores how these efforts have intersected with issues of gender, slavery, and the pathologizing of political dissent, as well as campaigns for the absolute freedom of research, the functioning of Nazism and the Holocaust in the American political imagination, civil liberties in the Post-9/11 world, and ongoing debates over animal rights, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and domestic terrorism.</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>