<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T04:24:54Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/122209" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/122209</identifier><datestamp>2022-02-01T18:58:56Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Donna Rhodes and George Westerman.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Mihaylova, Alexandra.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Data, Systems, and Society.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Technology and Policy Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Data, Systems, and Society</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Technology and Policy Program</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2019-09-17T16:29:48Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2019-09-17T16:29:48Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2019</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2019</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122209</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">1117709955</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: S.M. in Technology and Policy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, 2019</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (pages 93-96).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">An increase in the stock of high skilled workers boosts labor productivity, though economic theory suggests some of the effect may be attenuated by skill mismatch. This research begins to identify and quantify the mechanisms through which skill mismatch affects employment outcomes. Several unique characteristics of personnel management in the US military, particularly in the Air Force, make it an attractive object of study for estimating the magnitude and range of such costs. Unlike most civilian employers, the Department of Defense directly observes the skills of incoming recruits through their achievement on the Armed Forces Qualification Test. Skill requirements for all specialties are expressed in terms of minimum qualifying scores. The matching process produces a differential between a worker's skills and the skills required by her job. Using historical Air Force recruitment and career data, it is possible to identify the relationship between skill mismatch and employment outcomes such as retention and tenure. Using a probit model specification and an instrumental variables approach, this research finds that poorly-matched workers are 20 percent less likely to be retained relative to well-matched workers. Effects of mismatch are most pronounced among high-aptitude workers. The difference in response to skill mismatch between men and women is statistically indistinguishable. These estimates offer a means to quantify the benefits an employer can expect from more thorough evaluation and better job matching of prospective workers. Technological innovations in online learning platforms and skill evaluations offer opportunities to improve matching outcomes. Strategic partnerships between online learning content providers, businesses and workers are important to make these improvements a reality.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Alexandra Mihaylova.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M. in Technology and Policy</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="collection" lang="en_US">S.M.inTechnologyandPolicy Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Institute for Data, Systems, and Society</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">96 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Institute for Data, Systems, and Society.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Technology and Policy Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Occupational skill mismatch and the consequences to employment outcomes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="imported" lang="en_US">2019-09-17T16:29:46Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">Master</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="department" lang="en_US">ESD</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="department" lang="en_US">IDSS</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="2e1bfff5-d1f5-4fbb-aad4-3cd5a7d68950">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Occupational skill mismatch and the consequences to employment outcomes&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2019&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Mihaylova, Alexandra.&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Institute for Data, Systems, and Society.&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Technology and Policy Program.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>An increase in the stock of high skilled workers boosts labor productivity, though economic theory suggests some of the effect may be attenuated by skill mismatch. This research begins to identify and quantify the mechanisms through which skill mismatch affects employment outcomes. Several unique characteristics of personnel management in the US military, particularly in the Air Force, make it an attractive object of study for estimating the magnitude and range of such costs. Unlike most civilian employers, the Department of Defense directly observes the skills of incoming recruits through their achievement on the Armed Forces Qualification Test. Skill requirements for all specialties are expressed in terms of minimum qualifying scores. The matching process produces a differential between a worker&amp;apos;s skills and the skills required by her job. Using historical Air Force recruitment and career data, it is possible to identify the relationship between skill mismatch and employment outcomes such as retention and tenure. Using a probit model specification and an instrumental variables approach, this research finds that poorly-matched workers are 20 percent less likely to be retained relative to well-matched workers. Effects of mismatch are most pronounced among high-aptitude workers. The difference in response to skill mismatch between men and women is statistically indistinguishable. These estimates offer a means to quantify the benefits an employer can expect from more thorough evaluation and better job matching of prospective workers. Technological innovations in online learning platforms and skill evaluations offer opportunities to improve matching outcomes. Strategic partnerships between online learning content providers, businesses and workers are important to make these improvements a reality.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>