2026-09-19T17:52:42Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request

oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/1223372022-01-13T07:55:19Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023

Anne Quaadgras. Arora, Anubhav,S.M.Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Program. System Design and Management Program. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Program 2019-09-26T21:00:25Z 2019-09-26T21:00:25Z 2019 2019 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122337 1119537199 Thesis: S.M. in Engineering and Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Program, 2019 Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (pages 77-79). Patients with comorbid physical, behavioral, and social needs-often referred to as high-need patients-tend to be the most frequent utilizers of the health care system. The US health care system, with fragmented behavioral and medical health care sectors, is unable to effectively meet the complex needs of high-need patients. This results in high health care utilization, increased health care costs, and poor health outcomes among this population. Behavioral Health Integration in Primary Care (BHIPC) is widely promoted as a means to improve access, quality and continuity of health care services in a more efficient way, especially for people with complex needs. Hundreds of BHIPC programs are being implemented across health care settings in the US. However, the concept of BHIPC is wide-ranging, and it has been used as an overarching approach to describe integration efforts that vary in design, scope, and value. Research on how BHIPC is implemented in practice is limited. Practitioners and policymakers find it challenging to evaluate BHIPC programs and identify and scale-up its most critical elements. In this thesis, I develop a design-based framework that deconstructs the ambiguous concept of BHIPC into a set of tangible design elements and decisions. Furthermore, in order to inform how BHIPC is implemented in practice, I use this design-based framework to examine the behavioral health integration programs in four community health centers in Massachusetts. I found that by just comparing the underlying design elements, it is difficult to assess BHIPC programs and distinguish a successful program from an unsuccessful one. I therefore recommend and propose an outcomes-based framework for differentiating and evaluating BHIPC programs. I also recommend that future researchers refine and standardize the process measures I introduce so that they can be used as guideposts by primary care practitioners to develop their BHIPC programs. by Anubhav Arora. S.M. in Engineering and Management S.M.inEngineeringandManagement Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Program 82 pages eng Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 Engineering and Management Program. System Design and Management Program. Designing behavioral health integration in primary care : a practical outcomes-based framework Thesis application/pdf 2019-09-26T21:00:22Z Publication Master SysDes unknown unknown <Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="d73430f4-9bd3-4201-ac95-41f5e25b504f"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>Designing behavioral health integration in primary care : a practical outcomes-based framework</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2019</PublicationDate> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Arora, Anubhav,S.M.Massachusetts Institute of Technology.</DisplayName> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License> <Keyword>Engineering and Management Program.</Keyword> <Keyword>System Design and Management Program.</Keyword> <Abstract>Patients with comorbid physical, behavioral, and social needs-often referred to as high-need patients-tend to be the most frequent utilizers of the health care system. The US health care system, with fragmented behavioral and medical health care sectors, is unable to effectively meet the complex needs of high-need patients. This results in high health care utilization, increased health care costs, and poor health outcomes among this population. Behavioral Health Integration in Primary Care (BHIPC) is widely promoted as a means to improve access, quality and continuity of health care services in a more efficient way, especially for people with complex needs. Hundreds of BHIPC programs are being implemented across health care settings in the US. However, the concept of BHIPC is wide-ranging, and it has been used as an overarching approach to describe integration efforts that vary in design, scope, and value. Research on how BHIPC is implemented in practice is limited. Practitioners and policymakers find it challenging to evaluate BHIPC programs and identify and scale-up its most critical elements. In this thesis, I develop a design-based framework that deconstructs the ambiguous concept of BHIPC into a set of tangible design elements and decisions. Furthermore, in order to inform how BHIPC is implemented in practice, I use this design-based framework to examine the behavioral health integration programs in four community health centers in Massachusetts. I found that by just comparing the underlying design elements, it is difficult to assess BHIPC programs and distinguish a successful program from an unsuccessful one. I therefore recommend and propose an outcomes-based framework for differentiating and evaluating BHIPC programs. I also recommend that future researchers refine and standardize the process measures I introduce so that they can be used as guideposts by primary care practitioners to develop their BHIPC programs.</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication>