2026-09-19T12:18:42Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/1225132021-07-05T14:03:20Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023
Kerri L. Cahoy.
Holden, Bobby Glenn,II.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
2019-10-11T21:59:43Z
2019-10-11T21:59:43Z
2019
2019
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122513
1121262694
Thesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 81-85).
This work implements distributed onboard planning and scheduling approach for crosslinked small satellites Earth observation missions. The example cases used involve 65 small satellites in ISS and Sun Synchronous Orbits, as well as NASA's Near Earth Network groundstations, and three target cases. Target cases include urgent observations. This work focuses on handling dynamic modifications to an existing nominal plan. The disruptions considered include failures to complete an activity and new user requests. The Scheduling Planning Routing Intersatellite Networking Tool, or SPRINT, is the infrastructure used in this work. SPRINT's global planner advances the state of the art by addressing the combinatorially expensive crosslink routing planning challenges, given the constraints of small satellites. SPRINT's distributed onboard planner, the focus of this work, manages both proactive state sharing and reactive planning activities. By introducing robust onboard planning components, high-performance schedules are enabled. An atmospheric model is integrated to provide the SPRINT scenarios. Results are presented for performance of the onboard replanning system. Given arbitrary activity failures, improvement, by means of reduction of the penalty, of 6 to 10 times the unmitigated effects are demonstrated using the onboard planning approach. A path to flight software integration is developed.
NASA Small Spacecraft Technology Program (SSTP)Grant/ Cooperative Agreement Number 80NSSC18M0042
by Bobby Glenn Holden II.
S.M.
S.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
85 pages
eng
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Onboard distributed replanning for crosslinked small satellite constellations
Thesis
application/pdf
2019-10-11T21:59:42Z
Publication
Master
Aero
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="4354e105-0877-404a-89da-4eb86e149954">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Language>eng</Language>
<Title>Onboard distributed replanning for crosslinked small satellite constellations</Title>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>2019</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Holden, Bobby Glenn,II.</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License>
<Keyword>Aeronautics and Astronautics.</Keyword>
<Abstract>This work implements distributed onboard planning and scheduling approach for crosslinked small satellites Earth observation missions. The example cases used involve 65 small satellites in ISS and Sun Synchronous Orbits, as well as NASA's Near Earth Network groundstations, and three target cases. Target cases include urgent observations. This work focuses on handling dynamic modifications to an existing nominal plan. The disruptions considered include failures to complete an activity and new user requests. The Scheduling Planning Routing Intersatellite Networking Tool, or SPRINT, is the infrastructure used in this work. SPRINT's global planner advances the state of the art by addressing the combinatorially expensive crosslink routing planning challenges, given the constraints of small satellites. SPRINT's distributed onboard planner, the focus of this work, manages both proactive state sharing and reactive planning activities. By introducing robust onboard planning components, high-performance schedules are enabled. An atmospheric model is integrated to provide the SPRINT scenarios. Results are presented for performance of the onboard replanning system. Given arbitrary activity failures, improvement, by means of reduction of the penalty, of 6 to 10 times the unmitigated effects are demonstrated using the onboard planning approach. A path to flight software integration is developed.</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>