<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T08:26:02Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/122992" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/122992</identifier><datestamp>2026-06-06T00:54:34Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Una-May O'Reilly and Erik Hemberg.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Zhang, Linda(Linda E.)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2019-11-22T00:00:36Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2019-11-22T00:00:36Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2019</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2019</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122992</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">1127291730</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">This electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: M. Eng., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2019</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (pages 55-57).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) cyberattacks continue to increase and cause disruptions in both industry and politics. As more critical information and services are provided through networks, it becomes more important to keep these networks available. However, since cyber-adversaries continuously change and adapt, stationary defense strategies do not effectively secure networks against attacks. We modeled attacker-defender interactions using competitive coevolutionary algorithms and investigated Nash equilibria within these cybersecurity problems. In particular, we examined and presented variations on two existing algorithms that look for Nash equilibria: NashSolve and HybridCoev. To compare these algorithms' performances against other existing heuristics, we considered multiple evaluation methods: the first calculates average fitness scores, the second creates a compendium of MEU, MinMax, and inverse Pareto front ratio scores, and the third utilizes Nash averaging. Although NashSolve and HybridCoev do not perform significantly better on average for either attacker or defender populations relative to other heuristics in these evaluations, they are able to produce strong individual strategies.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Linda Zhang.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">M.Eng.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="collection" lang="en_US">M.Eng. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">57 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Investigating coevolutionary algorithms for finding Nash equilibria in cybersecurity problems</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="imported" lang="en_US">2019-11-22T00:00:35Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">Master</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="department" lang="en_US">EECS</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="67381b76-f4f3-4318-bca4-e56b78402d42">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Investigating coevolutionary algorithms for finding Nash equilibria in cybersecurity problems&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2019&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Zhang, Linda(Linda E.)&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) cyberattacks continue to increase and cause disruptions in both industry and politics. As more critical information and services are provided through networks, it becomes more important to keep these networks available. However, since cyber-adversaries continuously change and adapt, stationary defense strategies do not effectively secure networks against attacks. We modeled attacker-defender interactions using competitive coevolutionary algorithms and investigated Nash equilibria within these cybersecurity problems. In particular, we examined and presented variations on two existing algorithms that look for Nash equilibria: NashSolve and HybridCoev. To compare these algorithms&amp;apos; performances against other existing heuristics, we considered multiple evaluation methods: the first calculates average fitness scores, the second creates a compendium of MEU, MinMax, and inverse Pareto front ratio scores, and the third utilizes Nash averaging. Although NashSolve and HybridCoev do not perform significantly better on average for either attacker or defender populations relative to other heuristics in these evaluations, they are able to produce strong individual strategies.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>