<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T02:16:07Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/124205" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/124205</identifier><datestamp>2021-07-05T14:03:20Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Leia Stirling.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">McKeen, Patrick Calvin.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2020-03-23T20:45:21Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2020-03-23T20:45:21Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2019</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2019</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124205</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">1144176464</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">This electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (pages 177-181).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">Space suits are crucial to human spaceflight, but can restrict motion, require additional energy, and increase injury risk. Previous planetary suits were largely based on flexible components, which generate additional forces on the occupant as they resist volumetric changes from flexing components. The NASA Mark III suit addresses this problem using a Hip Brief Assembly (HBA), composed of rigid, constant-volume sections connected by bearings. However, due to the rigid components and fixed degrees of freedom (DoFs), the HBA and other hard-component joint assemblies (HCJAs) have stricter bounds on motion. For example, previous analysis shows that the hip multi-DoF range of motion (ROM) for an HBA occupant is not well-aligned with the nominal hip ROM during gait (gait NHROM). In this thesis, a set of methods for describing HCJA geometry and the effect on occupant ROM is presented.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">A generalized model builds on Denavit-Hartenberg parameterization to describe HCJA structure, rotation, and surface shape. Also included is a computational approach, compatible with standard 3D model files, to estimate the multi-DoF ROM for joints of an HCJA occupant, and compare and score the suit-restricted ROMs against nominal, unencumbered ROMs. These models are utilized to analyze HBA geometry and improve alignment between in-suit occupant ROM and gait NHROM. A set of design constraints based on feasible geometries and parameter bounds were devised and used to limit a tradespace analysis of alternate geometries in the HBA model. The geometries were evaluated and given an ROM score based on occupant access to gait NHROM. Over 1.3 billion alternate geometries were tested, and 10,912 met or bested the nominal geometry.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">The top-scoring geometry showed a more than sixfold improvement on access to gait NHROM, as well as a more natural neutral leg position, a significant increase in adduction range, and improved kneeling ability. The tradespace data set is also used to analyze trends in HBA geometry, suggesting two-bearing HBAs would have very poor hip ROM and the most dominant factors behind a high ROM score is the extent of the cant in the HBA Proximal and Distal sections.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Patrick Calvin McKeen.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="collection" lang="en_US">S.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">181 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Aeronautics and Astronautics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Modeling and tradespace exploration of a space suit hip bearing assembly using multi-degree-of-freedom range of motion analysis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="imported" lang="en_US">2020-03-23T20:45:20Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">Master</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="department" lang="en_US">Aero</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="0a2ce517-4978-4b0f-b960-eefcad6380c2">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Modeling and tradespace exploration of a space suit hip bearing assembly using multi-degree-of-freedom range of motion analysis&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2019&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>McKeen, Patrick Calvin.&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Aeronautics and Astronautics.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>Space suits are crucial to human spaceflight, but can restrict motion, require additional energy, and increase injury risk. Previous planetary suits were largely based on flexible components, which generate additional forces on the occupant as they resist volumetric changes from flexing components. The NASA Mark III suit addresses this problem using a Hip Brief Assembly (HBA), composed of rigid, constant-volume sections connected by bearings. However, due to the rigid components and fixed degrees of freedom (DoFs), the HBA and other hard-component joint assemblies (HCJAs) have stricter bounds on motion. For example, previous analysis shows that the hip multi-DoF range of motion (ROM) for an HBA occupant is not well-aligned with the nominal hip ROM during gait (gait NHROM). In this thesis, a set of methods for describing HCJA geometry and the effect on occupant ROM is presented.&lt;/Abstract>
   	&lt;Abstract>A generalized model builds on Denavit-Hartenberg parameterization to describe HCJA structure, rotation, and surface shape. Also included is a computational approach, compatible with standard 3D model files, to estimate the multi-DoF ROM for joints of an HCJA occupant, and compare and score the suit-restricted ROMs against nominal, unencumbered ROMs. These models are utilized to analyze HBA geometry and improve alignment between in-suit occupant ROM and gait NHROM. A set of design constraints based on feasible geometries and parameter bounds were devised and used to limit a tradespace analysis of alternate geometries in the HBA model. The geometries were evaluated and given an ROM score based on occupant access to gait NHROM. Over 1.3 billion alternate geometries were tested, and 10,912 met or bested the nominal geometry.&lt;/Abstract>
   	&lt;Abstract>The top-scoring geometry showed a more than sixfold improvement on access to gait NHROM, as well as a more natural neutral leg position, a significant increase in adduction range, and improved kneeling ability. The tradespace data set is also used to analyze trends in HBA geometry, suggesting two-bearing HBAs would have very poor hip ROM and the most dominant factors behind a high ROM score is the extent of the cant in the HBA Proximal and Distal sections.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>