<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T04:57:58Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/132841" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/132841</identifier><datestamp>2025-10-30T17:03:42Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Herbert H. Einstein.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Lee, Jeffrey Liang.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">System Design and Management Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Program</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2021-10-08T16:59:04Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2021-10-08T16:59:04Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2020</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2020</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/132841</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">1263244318</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: S.M. in Engineering and Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Program, September, 2020</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from the official version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (pages 65-67).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">Calibration of Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) In-line Inspection (ILI) tools is an important part of the overall pipeline integrity management process. Over-called or under-called corrosion features can have significant impacts on safety and resource management. This thesis examines methods for improving the Validation and Calibration processes using Bayesian Inference. The focus is on improving the tolerance that is applied to undug features to optimize the execution of risk-based repairs. A simulated data set was generated, with two separate categories, one which represents tool performance on basic features and another for challenging features. The calculated parameters of [alpha], [beta], and [sigma], were calculated using a Bayesian model leveraging a Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulator. The [sigma] parameter is used to determine the appropriate tolerance to apply and was compared with a [sigma] calculated via the method recommended by API 1163. Results from the example data set show that in challenged situations, the Confidence Level of the tool performance can be increased from 89% to 95% and the mean average error can be decreased using the Bayesian Inference model. Opportunities to use the methods outlined to improve other processes in ILI validation are discussed. By appropriately updating the likelihood used in the Bayesian model with dig data, the tolerance can more accurately represent the undug features and risk management decisions can be conducted accordingly.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Jeffrey Liang Lee.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M. in Engineering and Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="collection" lang="en_US">S.M.inEngineeringandManagement Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Program</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">67 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">MIT theses may be protected by copyright. Please reuse MIT thesis content according to the MIT Libraries Permissions Policy, which is available through the URL provided.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Engineering and Management Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">System Design and Management Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Bayesian calibration of in-line inspection tool tolerance</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="imported" lang="en_US">2021-10-08T16:59:04Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">Master</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="department" lang="en_US">SysDes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="05002568-5d72-44ad-af62-06c749af57b5">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Bayesian calibration of in-line inspection tool tolerance&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2020&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Lee, Jeffrey Liang.&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Engineering and Management Program.&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>System Design and Management Program.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>Calibration of Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) In-line Inspection (ILI) tools is an important part of the overall pipeline integrity management process. Over-called or under-called corrosion features can have significant impacts on safety and resource management. This thesis examines methods for improving the Validation and Calibration processes using Bayesian Inference. The focus is on improving the tolerance that is applied to undug features to optimize the execution of risk-based repairs. A simulated data set was generated, with two separate categories, one which represents tool performance on basic features and another for challenging features. The calculated parameters of [alpha], [beta], and [sigma], were calculated using a Bayesian model leveraging a Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulator. The [sigma] parameter is used to determine the appropriate tolerance to apply and was compared with a [sigma] calculated via the method recommended by API 1163. Results from the example data set show that in challenged situations, the Confidence Level of the tool performance can be increased from 89% to 95% and the mean average error can be decreased using the Bayesian Inference model. Opportunities to use the methods outlined to improve other processes in ILI validation are discussed. By appropriately updating the likelihood used in the Bayesian model with dig data, the tolerance can more accurately represent the undug features and risk management decisions can be conducted accordingly.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>