2026-09-19T04:41:36Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/1393952022-01-15T03:59:00Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023
Boning, Duane S.
Golrezaei, Negin (Nicki)
Dumont, Felix
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Sloan School of Management
2022-01-14T15:08:56Z
2022-01-14T15:08:56Z
2021-06
2021-06-10T19:13:05.875Z
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/139395
We propose an end-to-end process and tool to deep-dive scanner issues at Amazon’s sorter sites, allowing us to categorize no-reads into operational issues or actual equipment issues.
Our tool sends no-read scanner images to a separate Amazon Web Services (AWS) server and post-processes them through ResNet deep learning models tuned through Bayesian optimization to appropriately assign potential fault reasons. This program will grow the team’s understanding of material handling equipment and best practices to trigger and handle exception case scenarios. A conservative entitlement is approximately $2.2MM for the pilot sites in annual savings excluding customer impact.
Scanner/Vision tunnel performance at Amazon’s large crossbelt sorter sites tends to average around 80-90% read rate success, contributing to a large amount of manual rework and recirculation impacting sorter utilization. Amazon is well away from their target of 98% scanner performance for these sites. Furthermore, the mechanism to deep-dive scanner issues makes it extremely difficult to categorize them into operational issues or actual equipment issues and as a result, we have very little visibility as to no-read causes across sites and cannot properly put together a plan to improve the situation.
A user-friendly interface allows site and operations managers to see which sites are lagging behind, perform a deep-dive into the root cause of the issues and test potential operational or equipment fixes.
M.B.A.
S.M.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted
Copyright retained by author(s)
https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/
Deep Learning Models of Scanner/Vision Tunnel Performance in Sortation Subsystems
Thesis
application/pdf
Master
Master of Business Administration
Master of Science in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="2dfd880a-a4fe-4ceb-9919-733c5b7f1fd6">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Title>Deep Learning Models of Scanner/Vision Tunnel Performance in Sortation Subsystems</Title>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>2021-06</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Dumont, Felix</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/</License>
<Abstract>We propose an end-to-end process and tool to deep-dive scanner issues at Amazon’s sorter sites, allowing us to categorize no-reads into operational issues or actual equipment issues.
Our tool sends no-read scanner images to a separate Amazon Web Services (AWS) server and post-processes them through ResNet deep learning models tuned through Bayesian optimization to appropriately assign potential fault reasons. This program will grow the team’s understanding of material handling equipment and best practices to trigger and handle exception case scenarios. A conservative entitlement is approximately $2.2MM for the pilot sites in annual savings excluding customer impact.
Scanner/Vision tunnel performance at Amazon’s large crossbelt sorter sites tends to average around 80-90% read rate success, contributing to a large amount of manual rework and recirculation impacting sorter utilization. Amazon is well away from their target of 98% scanner performance for these sites. Furthermore, the mechanism to deep-dive scanner issues makes it extremely difficult to categorize them into operational issues or actual equipment issues and as a result, we have very little visibility as to no-read causes across sites and cannot properly put together a plan to improve the situation.
A user-friendly interface allows site and operations managers to see which sites are lagging behind, perform a deep-dive into the root cause of the issues and test potential operational or equipment fixes.</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>