<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T03:29:03Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/144493" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/144493</identifier><datestamp>2022-08-30T03:44:18Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">de Weck, Olivier</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Gentgen, Chloé</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2022-08-29T15:51:20Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2022-08-29T15:51:20Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2022-05</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="submitted">2022-06-09T16:14:16.878Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/144493</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="orcid">https://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-7222-2276</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">As CubeSats have proved their benefits for missions ranging from Earth observation, communication, navigation, or science, miniaturized propulsion systems have been actively developed and demonstrated in-flight to support these applications. Propulsion systems are primarily divided into two main categories. Chemical propulsion systems benefit from high thrust to perform impulsive maneuvers but have a low specific impulse. On the other hand, electric propulsion systems have a much lower thrust but a high specific impulse, thus resulting in large delta-v budgets. While common for larger spacecraft to include both types of propulsion on-board, the stringent size, weight, and power constraints on CubeSat have mainly limited CubeSats to only one type of propulsion.&#xd;
&#xd;
However, the research and development in propulsion systems miniaturization over the last couple of years provides an opportunity to reconsider and evaluate the current and future feasibility of hybrid chemical-electric systems. Hybrid propulsion systems combine two or more propulsion technologies into a spacecraft without any shared hardware and could unlock ambitious missions. One such example is ReCon (Reconfigurable Constellations), a concept developed to enable remote sensing constellations to image specific areas of interest with an increased spatial and temporal resolution, on-demand, and without increasing constellation sizes. These constellations require significant maneuvering capabilities, including responsive impulsive transfers when time-sensitive observation needs arise -- for instance, during extreme weather events or conflicts.&#xd;
&#xd;
This thesis will evaluate the performance and feasibility of hybrid chemical-electric propulsion systems on CubeSats as an alternative to chemical-only systems for missions requiring high-thrust capabilities and large delta-v budgets. Feasible architectures relying on commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) systems are identified, and their performance is compared to single-mode systems according to different constraints and performance requirements. 2U was identified as the minimum volume required for COTS hybrid chemical-electric architectures to be advantageous over single-mode systems. In a 2U volume, more than 20 hybrid chemical-electric architectures can provide a delta-v for impulsive maneuvers above 70 m/s with a delta-v for low-thrust maneuvers superior to 220 m/s while satisfying power constraints, while the optimal chemical system can provide only up to 245 m/s of delta-v. &#xd;
&#xd;
Improved hybrid architectures can be generated by concurrent design optimization of the chemical and electric systems. The design space of hybrid architectures is explored through the parametric modeling of a cold gas thruster, a green monopropellant, and an ion thruster. The optimality gap with previously generated designs is then quantified. Hybrid designs with a volume as small as 1.5U can then exceed the performance of single-mode systems. This approach demonstrates that custom-designed hybrid payloads can meet and exceed mission requirements better than COTS hybrid payloads; however, it comes with an increased cost due to additional research and development needs, resulting in necessary tradeoffs.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">Copyright MIT</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri">http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title">Hybrid Chemical-Electric Propulsion Systems for CubeSats</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="degree">Master</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name">Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="579ad9f4-14c0-4050-8e3a-ab8f1ca361b0">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
   	&lt;Title>Hybrid Chemical-Electric Propulsion Systems for CubeSats&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2022-05&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Gentgen, Chloé&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/&lt;/License>
   	&lt;Abstract>As CubeSats have proved their benefits for missions ranging from Earth observation, communication, navigation, or science, miniaturized propulsion systems have been actively developed and demonstrated in-flight to support these applications. Propulsion systems are primarily divided into two main categories. Chemical propulsion systems benefit from high thrust to perform impulsive maneuvers but have a low specific impulse. On the other hand, electric propulsion systems have a much lower thrust but a high specific impulse, thus resulting in large delta-v budgets. While common for larger spacecraft to include both types of propulsion on-board, the stringent size, weight, and power constraints on CubeSat have mainly limited CubeSats to only one type of propulsion.&#xd;
&#xd;
However, the research and development in propulsion systems miniaturization over the last couple of years provides an opportunity to reconsider and evaluate the current and future feasibility of hybrid chemical-electric systems. Hybrid propulsion systems combine two or more propulsion technologies into a spacecraft without any shared hardware and could unlock ambitious missions. One such example is ReCon (Reconfigurable Constellations), a concept developed to enable remote sensing constellations to image specific areas of interest with an increased spatial and temporal resolution, on-demand, and without increasing constellation sizes. These constellations require significant maneuvering capabilities, including responsive impulsive transfers when time-sensitive observation needs arise -- for instance, during extreme weather events or conflicts.&#xd;
&#xd;
This thesis will evaluate the performance and feasibility of hybrid chemical-electric propulsion systems on CubeSats as an alternative to chemical-only systems for missions requiring high-thrust capabilities and large delta-v budgets. Feasible architectures relying on commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) systems are identified, and their performance is compared to single-mode systems according to different constraints and performance requirements. 2U was identified as the minimum volume required for COTS hybrid chemical-electric architectures to be advantageous over single-mode systems. In a 2U volume, more than 20 hybrid chemical-electric architectures can provide a delta-v for impulsive maneuvers above 70 m/s with a delta-v for low-thrust maneuvers superior to 220 m/s while satisfying power constraints, while the optimal chemical system can provide only up to 245 m/s of delta-v. &#xd;
&#xd;
Improved hybrid architectures can be generated by concurrent design optimization of the chemical and electric systems. The design space of hybrid architectures is explored through the parametric modeling of a cold gas thruster, a green monopropellant, and an ion thruster. The optimality gap with previously generated designs is then quantified. Hybrid designs with a volume as small as 1.5U can then exceed the performance of single-mode systems. This approach demonstrates that custom-designed hybrid payloads can meet and exceed mission requirements better than COTS hybrid payloads; however, it comes with an increased cost due to additional research and development needs, resulting in necessary tradeoffs.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>