<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-21T18:40:09Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/144680" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/144680</identifier><datestamp>2022-08-30T03:39:29Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Andreas, Jacob</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Bau, Anthony</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2022-08-29T16:04:17Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2022-08-29T16:04:17Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2022-05</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="submitted">2022-06-02T20:24:16.955Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/144680</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">How do syntax and semantics interact in neural language models? Is the intuitive dichotomy between semantics and syntax useful as a mental model of their behavior? In this thesis, I systematically investigate how models handle the interactions between sentence corruptions of each kind. I develop a setup for generating “syntactic” and “semantic” corruptions and combining them. Using this setup, I develop a general framework for understanding how classes of corruptions interact with each other, arguing that this can be understood in terms of a single “entanglement” parameter. This allows me to quantify entanglement between syntax and semantics in a variety of situations. The result is that semantics is more entangled with syntax than it is with itself, and that syntax is highly self-entangled.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree">M.Eng.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">Copyright MIT</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri">http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title">Interactions Between Syntax and Semantics in Language Models</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="degree">Master</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name">Master of Engineering in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="6b0e294b-61d2-4216-81e3-3360d83a8de6">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
   	&lt;Title>Interactions Between Syntax and Semantics in Language Models&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2022-05&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Bau, Anthony&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/&lt;/License>
   	&lt;Abstract>How do syntax and semantics interact in neural language models? Is the intuitive dichotomy between semantics and syntax useful as a mental model of their behavior? In this thesis, I systematically investigate how models handle the interactions between sentence corruptions of each kind. I develop a setup for generating “syntactic” and “semantic” corruptions and combining them. Using this setup, I develop a general framework for understanding how classes of corruptions interact with each other, arguing that this can be understood in terms of a single “entanglement” parameter. This allows me to quantify entanglement between syntax and semantics in a variety of situations. The result is that semantics is more entangled with syntax than it is with itself, and that syntax is highly self-entangled.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>