<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T12:48:29Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/144968" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/144968</identifier><datestamp>2022-08-30T03:28:53Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131022</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Wittrup, K. Dane</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Cowles, Sarah Clare</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2022-08-29T16:24:16Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2022-08-29T16:24:16Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2022-05</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="submitted">2022-05-19T15:37:14.417Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/144968</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="orcid">https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-2246-6333</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeted to the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) remain the most prevalent cancer immunotherapy both as a monotherapy and in combination with additional therapies. Despite the extensive success of anti-PD-1 mAbs in the clinic, the experimental relationship between binding affinity and functional potency for anti-PD-1 antibodies in vivo has not been reported. Two widely-used FDA-approved anti-PD-1 antibodies, nivolumab and pembrolizumab have similar single digit nanomolar equilibrium binding constants (KD). Anti-PD-1 antibodies with higher and lower affinity than nivolumab or pembrolizumab are entering the clinic and show varied pre-clinical efficacy. Here, we explore the role of broad-ranging affinity variation on efficacy within a single lineage in a syngeneic immunocompetent mouse model. &#xd;
&#xd;
Using yeast surface display and affinity maturation, we engineered a panel of murine anti-PD-1 antibodies with varying affinity (ranging from KD = 20 pM - 15 nM). A combination of equilibrium and kinetic sorting strategies was used to both improve and reduce the affinity of a parental anti-PD-1 clone, 29F.1A12. We characterized the affinity of the antibodies using a number of methods, including ELISA, off-rate bead assays, and bio-layer interferometry, to confirm the wide range of affinity. We also characterized the internalization rate and pharmacokinetic clearance rate of our antibodies to confirm a consistent drug profile aside from mPD-1 affinity. Using these experimentally-determined rates and literature values, we developed a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to complement the in vivo results and highlight the direct relationship between dose, affinity, and PD-1 target saturation in the tumor.&#xd;
&#xd;
Through in vivo efficacy studies using the MC38 murine adenocarcinoma model, we found that there is an affinity threshold required for maximum efficacy at a given dose of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. We demonstrate that efficacy can be rescued by increasing the dose of a low affinity clone. Thus alternatively, we show that for a given affinity, there is a dose threshold required to achieve maximum efficacy. Ultimately, we conclude that the anti-PD-1 affinity/dose relationship supports a clear receptor-occupancy mechanism of action.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree">Ph.D.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">Copyright MIT</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri">http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title">An Affinity Threshold for Maximum Efficacy in Anti-PD-1 Cancer Immunotherapy</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="degree">Doctoral</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name">Doctor of Philosophy</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="9a0cec66-db56-4080-b460-d5674139af2e">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
   	&lt;Title>An Affinity Threshold for Maximum Efficacy in Anti-PD-1 Cancer Immunotherapy&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2022-05&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Cowles, Sarah Clare&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/&lt;/License>
   	&lt;Abstract>Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeted to the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) remain the most prevalent cancer immunotherapy both as a monotherapy and in combination with additional therapies. Despite the extensive success of anti-PD-1 mAbs in the clinic, the experimental relationship between binding affinity and functional potency for anti-PD-1 antibodies in vivo has not been reported. Two widely-used FDA-approved anti-PD-1 antibodies, nivolumab and pembrolizumab have similar single digit nanomolar equilibrium binding constants (KD). Anti-PD-1 antibodies with higher and lower affinity than nivolumab or pembrolizumab are entering the clinic and show varied pre-clinical efficacy. Here, we explore the role of broad-ranging affinity variation on efficacy within a single lineage in a syngeneic immunocompetent mouse model. &#xd;
&#xd;
Using yeast surface display and affinity maturation, we engineered a panel of murine anti-PD-1 antibodies with varying affinity (ranging from KD = 20 pM - 15 nM). A combination of equilibrium and kinetic sorting strategies was used to both improve and reduce the affinity of a parental anti-PD-1 clone, 29F.1A12. We characterized the affinity of the antibodies using a number of methods, including ELISA, off-rate bead assays, and bio-layer interferometry, to confirm the wide range of affinity. We also characterized the internalization rate and pharmacokinetic clearance rate of our antibodies to confirm a consistent drug profile aside from mPD-1 affinity. Using these experimentally-determined rates and literature values, we developed a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to complement the in vivo results and highlight the direct relationship between dose, affinity, and PD-1 target saturation in the tumor.&#xd;
&#xd;
Through in vivo efficacy studies using the MC38 murine adenocarcinoma model, we found that there is an affinity threshold required for maximum efficacy at a given dose of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. We demonstrate that efficacy can be rescued by increasing the dose of a low affinity clone. Thus alternatively, we show that for a given affinity, there is a dose threshold required to achieve maximum efficacy. Ultimately, we conclude that the anti-PD-1 affinity/dose relationship supports a clear receptor-occupancy mechanism of action.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>