<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T18:47:55Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/145120" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/145120</identifier><datestamp>2022-08-30T03:53:18Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Moser, Bryan R.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Shoji, Yoshiki</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">System Design and Management Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2022-08-29T16:34:13Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2022-08-29T16:34:13Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2022-05</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="submitted">2022-06-28T20:28:36.606Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/145120</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">Japan's productivity growth has slowed since the 2000s, and in 2020 it ranked last among the G7 countries. Assuming that the reason for this is the rapid pace of technological change, this study uses a literature review and data analysis to identify the factors that contribute to technology adoption, which are often described as cultural differences. By summarizing supporting forces and restraining forces within a company and visualizing the process of technology adoption, a framework of technology adoption is constructed. There, the focus is on the aspect of acquiring human resources. As a result of the data analysis based on data from Orbis, LinkedIn, indeed, Zephyr, D&amp;B Hoovers, and Ci Technology Data Set covering large manufacturing companies in the U.S., it is found that the more employees feel they are learning something in their work, the higher their adoption of technology will be. Surprisingly, however, no relationship is found between technology adoption and productivity, which can come down to a new hypothesis that technology adoption is a necessary but not sufficient condition for productivity growth. Based on the various data limitations identified in the process of conducting the analysis, the report summarizes a future research agenda to overcome these limitations.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">Copyright retained by author(s)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri">https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title">Factors Affecting Technology Adoption and Productivity in a Digital Era: a Framework Based on Literature Review and Future Agenda</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="degree">Master</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name">Master of Science in Engineering and Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="34653020-6c34-4fde-9355-bdb9ef04bdf3">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
   	&lt;Title>Factors Affecting Technology Adoption and Productivity in a Digital Era: a Framework Based on Literature Review and Future Agenda&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2022-05&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Shoji, Yoshiki&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/&lt;/License>
   	&lt;Abstract>Japan&amp;apos;s productivity growth has slowed since the 2000s, and in 2020 it ranked last among the G7 countries. Assuming that the reason for this is the rapid pace of technological change, this study uses a literature review and data analysis to identify the factors that contribute to technology adoption, which are often described as cultural differences. By summarizing supporting forces and restraining forces within a company and visualizing the process of technology adoption, a framework of technology adoption is constructed. There, the focus is on the aspect of acquiring human resources. As a result of the data analysis based on data from Orbis, LinkedIn, indeed, Zephyr, D&amp;amp;B Hoovers, and Ci Technology Data Set covering large manufacturing companies in the U.S., it is found that the more employees feel they are learning something in their work, the higher their adoption of technology will be. Surprisingly, however, no relationship is found between technology adoption and productivity, which can come down to a new hypothesis that technology adoption is a necessary but not sufficient condition for productivity growth. Based on the various data limitations identified in the process of conducting the analysis, the report summarizes a future research agenda to overcome these limitations.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>