<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T16:02:41Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/147320" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/147320</identifier><datestamp>2023-01-20T03:38:55Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Greitzer, Edward M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">White, Andrew Scott</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2023-01-19T18:45:16Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2023-01-19T18:45:16Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2022-09</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="submitted">2022-09-21T13:15:17.245Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/147320</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="orcid">0000-0002-0484-285X</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">This thesis assesses the feasibility of turbo-, hybrid-, and fully-electric aircraft propulsion systems to enable more efficient air transport. A modular optimization framework was developed to quantify system performance for single-aisle transport aircraft with a mission similar to a Boeing 737 MAX 8. Various propulsion systems leveraging superconducting motors, boundary layer ingestion, high-temperature PEM fuel cells, and liquid hydrogen fuel were examined. Aviation turbine fuel (ATF) and liquid hydrogen were compared using the payload-fuel energy intensity (PFEI), defined as the fuel energy required per product of range and payload.&#xd;
&#xd;
For a given mission, it was found that a hydrogen-fueled fully-electric configuration required similar fuel energy compared to an ATF-burning turbo-fan propulsion system (PFEI = 5.0). Relative to these systems, a hydrogen-fueled turbo-fan had 14% lower PFEI, an ATF-burning turbo-electric propulsion system had 23% higher PFEI, a hydrogen-fueled turbo-electric propulsion system had 8% lower PFEI, and a hydrogen-fueled hybrid-electric had 3% lower PFEI for the same mission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">Copyright MIT</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri">http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title">Trade-Space Analysis of Liquid Hydrogen Propulsion Systems for Electrified Aircraft</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="degree">Master</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name">Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="6492a74b-3a16-45b1-8f13-07ddff615510">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
   	&lt;Title>Trade-Space Analysis of Liquid Hydrogen Propulsion Systems for Electrified Aircraft&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2022-09&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>White, Andrew Scott&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/&lt;/License>
   	&lt;Abstract>This thesis assesses the feasibility of turbo-, hybrid-, and fully-electric aircraft propulsion systems to enable more efficient air transport. A modular optimization framework was developed to quantify system performance for single-aisle transport aircraft with a mission similar to a Boeing 737 MAX 8. Various propulsion systems leveraging superconducting motors, boundary layer ingestion, high-temperature PEM fuel cells, and liquid hydrogen fuel were examined. Aviation turbine fuel (ATF) and liquid hydrogen were compared using the payload-fuel energy intensity (PFEI), defined as the fuel energy required per product of range and payload.&#xd;
&#xd;
For a given mission, it was found that a hydrogen-fueled fully-electric configuration required similar fuel energy compared to an ATF-burning turbo-fan propulsion system (PFEI = 5.0). Relative to these systems, a hydrogen-fueled turbo-fan had 14% lower PFEI, an ATF-burning turbo-electric propulsion system had 23% higher PFEI, a hydrogen-fueled turbo-electric propulsion system had 8% lower PFEI, and a hydrogen-fueled hybrid-electric had 3% lower PFEI for the same mission.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>