2026-09-20T08:56:55Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/1473812023-01-20T03:31:44Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023
Ashford, Nicholas A.
Atto, Anthony R.
System Design and Management Program.
2023-01-19T18:49:22Z
2023-01-19T18:49:22Z
2022-09
2022-10-12T16:09:15.475Z
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/147381
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2683-9205
This thesis was motivated by the advent of digital technologies and their effects on workers. Using technology as a substitute for labor is a common industrial practice and the effects of substitution (though not the decision to substitute) will continue to dominate collective bargaining in the information age.
More relevant than substitution is the effect that digital technologies are having on the production process itself. It is becoming `taskified' and `digitized.' Decomposed into smaller, well-defined tasks that are also digitally compatible with each other, the entire production process is becoming easier to direct, control, and monitor. Each new task presents management a new lever of power in two forms -- the decision to substitute and the ability to monitor.
While substitution of technology for labor remains an issue, the complementarity of labor and technology contributions in the production process is becoming more important; apportioning value created to a factor in the production process is especially complicated and subjective with large numbers of complementary tasks.
The need for labor education is amplified by these factors and argues for a renewed interest in technology bargaining. A policy examination from various labor-related organizations and informant discussions suggest that labor recognizes this and is responding accordingly. Bargaining agreements have data and technology clauses, `digital union representatives' are being hired, and education on digital technologies is being prioritized.
Keywords: Complementarity, Decision bargaining, Effects bargaining, Industrial relations, Labor education, Labor substitution, Power, Production process, Taskification, Technology bargaining, Worker monitoring
S.M.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted
Copyright retained by author(s)
https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/
The Future of Technology Bargaining in the Information Age
Thesis
application/pdf
Master
Master of Science in Engineering and Management
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="876a8f87-82ed-46d1-ab2c-d364d41bd7dc">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Title>The Future of Technology Bargaining in the Information Age</Title>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>2022-09</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Atto, Anthony R.</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/</License>
<Abstract>This thesis was motivated by the advent of digital technologies and their effects on workers. Using technology as a substitute for labor is a common industrial practice and the effects of substitution (though not the decision to substitute) will continue to dominate collective bargaining in the information age.
More relevant than substitution is the effect that digital technologies are having on the production process itself. It is becoming `taskified' and `digitized.' Decomposed into smaller, well-defined tasks that are also digitally compatible with each other, the entire production process is becoming easier to direct, control, and monitor. Each new task presents management a new lever of power in two forms -- the decision to substitute and the ability to monitor.
While substitution of technology for labor remains an issue, the complementarity of labor and technology contributions in the production process is becoming more important; apportioning value created to a factor in the production process is especially complicated and subjective with large numbers of complementary tasks.
The need for labor education is amplified by these factors and argues for a renewed interest in technology bargaining. A policy examination from various labor-related organizations and informant discussions suggest that labor recognizes this and is responding accordingly. Bargaining agreements have data and technology clauses, `digital union representatives' are being hired, and education on digital technologies is being prioritized.
Keywords: Complementarity, Decision bargaining, Effects bargaining, Industrial relations, Labor education, Labor substitution, Power, Production process, Taskification, Technology bargaining, Worker monitoring</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>