2026-09-19T10:34:47Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request

oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/1501012023-04-01T03:14:59Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023

Shen, Kairos Dutta, Arindam Loescher-Montal, Angela Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture 2023-03-31T14:32:07Z 2023-03-31T14:32:07Z 2023-02 2023-02-28T18:52:30.072Z https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/150101 Across Berlin’s history, the street- as image, as space, as imaginary, as activity – has been, and continues to be, continuously appropriated and contested by stakeholders across the city - residents, owners, shopkeepers, tourists and others. Top-down politicians and public entities have long been grappling with how to position themselves (and their own desires) within this tension, using tools such as regulations and publicly funded projects as a form of developing an “appropriate” Straßenbild (street-image) to produce a desirable and cosmopolitan Stadtbild (city-image). As retail regulations constrain retail to interiors and developers favor larger longer-term retail contracts over smaller short-term “stunts”, I have begun to trace a shifting and unresolved paradigm. Permanence privileged over temporality. Certainty over uncertainty. Recent regulatory changes do not fall short of mentioning how current flying trade (fleamarkets, food trucks, etc.) “undermine” existing retail offerings. This project questions the typical process of gentrification under the ideological norms of “highest and best use” and takes up a large area of land in Friedrichshain currently slated for re-development to re-imagine temporary mentalities. This project is seen as a template for similar such projects, and in the spirit of temporary uses (transient, sedentary, and inhabited), most of the tactics – building included – can be adapted and moved across the city. By formalizing their existence, the thesis traces the legal and economic framework that many resident-driven retail, exchange and re-use initiatives uses navigate to exist in the city. Ultimately, this thesis remains unfinished, but its aims remain two-fold: to investigate temporary uses in relation to their regulatory and formal tactics and to re-enforce existing temporary practices through a supporting imaginary. It hopes to shift the fantasy of tectonic retail in this existing development, and in doing so, asks the question: can we nudge the imaginary of permanence? S.M. M.Arch. Massachusetts Institute of Technology In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted Copyright retained by author(s) https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/ Nudging Permanence Thesis application/pdf Master Master of Science in Real Estate Development Master of Architecture Publication unknown unknown <Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="bf918ccf-e9dc-4378-81aa-811b034efd20"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Title>Nudging Permanence</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2023-02</PublicationDate> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Loescher-Montal, Angela</DisplayName> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <License>https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/</License> <Abstract>Across Berlin’s history, the street- as image, as space, as imaginary, as activity – has been, and continues to be, continuously appropriated and contested by stakeholders across the city - residents, owners, shopkeepers, tourists and others. Top-down politicians and public entities have long been grappling with how to position themselves (and their own desires) within this tension, using tools such as regulations and publicly funded projects as a form of developing an “appropriate” Straßenbild (street-image) to produce a desirable and cosmopolitan Stadtbild (city-image). As retail regulations constrain retail to interiors and developers favor larger longer-term retail contracts over smaller short-term “stunts”, I have begun to trace a shifting and unresolved paradigm. Permanence privileged over temporality. Certainty over uncertainty. Recent regulatory changes do not fall short of mentioning how current flying trade (fleamarkets, food trucks, etc.) “undermine” existing retail offerings. This project questions the typical process of gentrification under the ideological norms of “highest and best use” and takes up a large area of land in Friedrichshain currently slated for re-development to re-imagine temporary mentalities. This project is seen as a template for similar such projects, and in the spirit of temporary uses (transient, sedentary, and inhabited), most of the tactics – building included – can be adapted and moved across the city. By formalizing their existence, the thesis traces the legal and economic framework that many resident-driven retail, exchange and re-use initiatives uses navigate to exist in the city. Ultimately, this thesis remains unfinished, but its aims remain two-fold: to investigate temporary uses in relation to their regulatory and formal tactics and to re-enforce existing temporary practices through a supporting imaginary. It hopes to shift the fantasy of tectonic retail in this existing development, and in doing so, asks the question: can we nudge the imaginary of permanence?</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication>