<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T23:35:12Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/151559" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/151559</identifier><datestamp>2023-08-01T04:22:17Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Rigobon, Roberto</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Robinet, Mathilde</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Sloan School of Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2023-07-31T19:48:34Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2023-07-31T19:48:34Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2023-06</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="submitted">2023-07-14T20:00:02.785Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/151559</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">This research investigates the motivations and decision-making patterns driving individuals' behavior when giving to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) causes. Through the concept of revealed preferences, this study offers  a comprehensive exploration of the intricate landscape of  ESG resource allocation. The analysis is conducted through the innovative use of the ESG Machine game, offering unique insights into how individual preferences shape unique allocation portfolios and the strategies underpinning these decisions. &#xd;
&#xd;
The study identifies four distinct archetypes of decision-making - payoff-maximizer based, equality-based, proportional-based, and value-based - and employs a suite of indicators to measure the degree of each archetype in individuals. A key finding is the dominance of value-based decision-making, although strategies like impact maximization and equal distribution of payoffs across all causes also emerged.&#xd;
&#xd;
These findings bear profound implications for ESG investing by offering invaluable insights that can shape the formulation of more potent investment strategies. By uncovering the complexities of individual decision-making and the differing strategies at play, this study paves the way for designing interventions that align personal values and financial choices effectively. This tailored approach has the potential to resonate deeply with individuals, engaging them based on their decision-making archetype, thereby enhancing the efficiency of ESG investments.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">Copyright retained by author(s)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri">https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title">Unveiling the ESG Landscape: Exploring Revealed Preferences&#xd;
through Archetypal Analysis of Decision-Makers in&#xd;
Environmental, Social, and Governance Causes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="degree">Master</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name">Master of Science in Management Studies</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="0bf334ed-a3bd-4dce-949b-b263399097ad">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
   	&lt;Title>Unveiling the ESG Landscape: Exploring Revealed Preferences&#xd;
through Archetypal Analysis of Decision-Makers in&#xd;
Environmental, Social, and Governance Causes&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate&gt;2023-06&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Robinet, Mathilde&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/&lt;/License>
   	&lt;Abstract>This research investigates the motivations and decision-making patterns driving individuals&amp;apos; behavior when giving to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) causes. Through the concept of revealed preferences, this study offers  a comprehensive exploration of the intricate landscape of  ESG resource allocation. The analysis is conducted through the innovative use of the ESG Machine game, offering unique insights into how individual preferences shape unique allocation portfolios and the strategies underpinning these decisions. &#xd;
&#xd;
The study identifies four distinct archetypes of decision-making - payoff-maximizer based, equality-based, proportional-based, and value-based - and employs a suite of indicators to measure the degree of each archetype in individuals. A key finding is the dominance of value-based decision-making, although strategies like impact maximization and equal distribution of payoffs across all causes also emerged.&#xd;
&#xd;
These findings bear profound implications for ESG investing by offering invaluable insights that can shape the formulation of more potent investment strategies. By uncovering the complexities of individual decision-making and the differing strategies at play, this study paves the way for designing interventions that align personal values and financial choices effectively. This tailored approach has the potential to resonate deeply with individuals, engaging them based on their decision-making archetype, thereby enhancing the efficiency of ESG investments.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>