<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T13:09:13Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/152865" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/152865</identifier><datestamp>2023-11-03T03:01:35Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131022</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Schneider, Ben Ross</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Giannoni, Matias Alberto</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2023-11-02T20:23:18Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2023-11-02T20:23:18Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2023-09</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="submitted">2023-10-24T19:59:50.423Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/152865</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">The limitations of existing political economy theories about the rise of populism motivate an approach that is centered on firms and employment trajectories as causes of individual frustration. In this dissertation, I explore the political economy causes of the rise of populism in both developed and developing economies. I address the gap in the literature that relates individual economic hardship and populist preferences. I argue that explanations proposing economic changes as causes of anti-system politics, like globalization, trade, or skill-biased technological change, are incomplete if firms are ignored. I test a firm-based theory of anti-system politics in Italy and Brazil, using a combination of original survey data, survey experiments and quasi-experimental designs. In the last chapter I focus on the case of France and show that there is a link between labor market characteristics, political deattachment, and a preference for outsider candidates that can operate independently of issue-based ideological preferences.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree">Ph.D.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">Copyright retained by author(s)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title">Firms, Labor Markets and Anti-System Politics: Essays on the Political Economy of Populism</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="degree">Doctoral</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name">Doctor of Philosophy</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="fb54cec5-7756-4bec-9bc6-c924b0fc8b8a">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
   	&lt;Title>Firms, Labor Markets and Anti-System Politics: Essays on the Political Economy of Populism&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2023-09&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Giannoni, Matias Alberto&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/&lt;/License>
   	&lt;Abstract>The limitations of existing political economy theories about the rise of populism motivate an approach that is centered on firms and employment trajectories as causes of individual frustration. In this dissertation, I explore the political economy causes of the rise of populism in both developed and developing economies. I address the gap in the literature that relates individual economic hardship and populist preferences. I argue that explanations proposing economic changes as causes of anti-system politics, like globalization, trade, or skill-biased technological change, are incomplete if firms are ignored. I test a firm-based theory of anti-system politics in Italy and Brazil, using a combination of original survey data, survey experiments and quasi-experimental designs. In the last chapter I focus on the case of France and show that there is a link between labor market characteristics, political deattachment, and a preference for outsider candidates that can operate independently of issue-based ideological preferences.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>