2026-09-19T16:03:26Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/1554192024-06-28T03:05:20Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023
Barrett, Steven R. H.
Allroggen, Florian
Housen, Tara
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
2024-06-27T19:52:08Z
2024-06-27T19:52:08Z
2024-05
2024-05-28T19:36:11.667Z
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/155419
Direct air capture (DAC) is a negative emissions technology (NET) that can contribute to mitigating climate change impacts by extracting CO₂ from the atmosphere. Given its low technical maturity, uncertainties persist regarding DAC's cost, scalability, and life-cycle emissions. In this analysis I assess liquid and solid DAC technologies powered by various energy sources to provide insights into its current and future economic viability and its net GHG emissions impact. My findings show electric DAC configurations relying on renewable electricity have high carbon removal efficiency and relatively low cost. Additionally, I quantify the climate impact of large-scale global DAC deployment with investments of 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, and 2% of the global GDP. I integrate electric DAC plants powered by renewable energy with co-located CO₂ storage sites. This analysis reveals that for scenarios with high anthropogenic emissions, DAC investments of up to 2% of global GDP cannot stabilize CO₂ concentrations. The results indicate that the 1.5°C goal can be achieved with an investment of 1.5% of the global GDP if cumulative emissions remain within 1178 GtCO₂; or with an investment of 0.5% of the global GDP if cumulative emissions remain within 981 GtCO₂. Alternatively, the 2°C goal can be achieved with an investment of 1.5% of the global GDP if cumulative emissions remain within 2750 GtCO₂; or with an investment of 0.5% of the global GDP if cumulative emissions remain within 1178 GtCO₂.
S.M.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted
Copyright retained by author(s)
https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/
Climate Impact Analysis of Direct Air Capture Deployment
Thesis
application/pdf
Master
Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="df0866fd-3287-4afe-8960-a74ebaf90a9c">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Title>Climate Impact Analysis of Direct Air Capture Deployment</Title>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>2024-05</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Housen, Tara</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/</License>
<Abstract>Direct air capture (DAC) is a negative emissions technology (NET) that can contribute to mitigating climate change impacts by extracting CO₂ from the atmosphere. Given its low technical maturity, uncertainties persist regarding DAC's cost, scalability, and life-cycle emissions. In this analysis I assess liquid and solid DAC technologies powered by various energy sources to provide insights into its current and future economic viability and its net GHG emissions impact. My findings show electric DAC configurations relying on renewable electricity have high carbon removal efficiency and relatively low cost. Additionally, I quantify the climate impact of large-scale global DAC deployment with investments of 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, and 2% of the global GDP. I integrate electric DAC plants powered by renewable energy with co-located CO₂ storage sites. This analysis reveals that for scenarios with high anthropogenic emissions, DAC investments of up to 2% of global GDP cannot stabilize CO₂ concentrations. The results indicate that the 1.5°C goal can be achieved with an investment of 1.5% of the global GDP if cumulative emissions remain within 1178 GtCO₂; or with an investment of 0.5% of the global GDP if cumulative emissions remain within 981 GtCO₂. Alternatively, the 2°C goal can be achieved with an investment of 1.5% of the global GDP if cumulative emissions remain within 2750 GtCO₂; or with an investment of 0.5% of the global GDP if cumulative emissions remain within 1178 GtCO₂.</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>