<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-23T14:04:46Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/155981" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/155981</identifier><datestamp>2024-08-13T03:07:20Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Johnson, Simon</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Dupont, Apolline</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Sloan School of Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2024-08-12T14:13:00Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2024-08-12T14:13:00Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2024-05</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="submitted">2024-06-25T18:19:50.448Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/155981</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">This thesis reimagines the assessment of large financial deals, such as mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;A), by proposing a holistic evaluation framework that considers economic, societal, and environmental consequences. Traditionally, these deals have been assessed primarily based on financial metrics, overlooking their broader impact on stakeholders and sustainability.&#xd;
&#xd;
Through a mixed-method approach combining literature review and qualitative interviews with professionals, this research develops a theoretical framework integrating multiple dimensions into the analysis of M&amp;A deals. The framework is applied to a case study of the contentious merger between French utility giants Veolia and Suez, highlighting the complexities and trade-offs involved in evaluating deals in the water and waste management sector.&#xd;
&#xd;
The findings underscore the importance of comprehensive impact assessments, robust stakeholder engagement, and long-term value creation strategies. The Veolia Suez case reveals the need for effective risk management and the potential for synergies and unintended consequences in large financial deals.&#xd;
Ultimately, this thesis argues that a holistic approach to impact assessment enables informed decision-making, promoting sustainable growth and safeguarding societal and environmental interests. The proposed framework offers a roadmap for enhancing practices and fostering a more responsible approach to financial transactions.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">Copyright retained by author(s)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri">https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title">Reimagining the Impact of Large Financial Deals: Toward a Holistic Evaluation of Economic and Societal Consequences</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="degree">Master</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name">Master of Science in Management Studies</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="d3f1e2ff-14ee-47bc-ad7c-8b3b86aa9df7">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
   	&lt;Title>Reimagining the Impact of Large Financial Deals: Toward a Holistic Evaluation of Economic and Societal Consequences&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2024-05&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Dupont, Apolline&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/&lt;/License>
   	&lt;Abstract>This thesis reimagines the assessment of large financial deals, such as mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;amp;A), by proposing a holistic evaluation framework that considers economic, societal, and environmental consequences. Traditionally, these deals have been assessed primarily based on financial metrics, overlooking their broader impact on stakeholders and sustainability.&#xd;
&#xd;
Through a mixed-method approach combining literature review and qualitative interviews with professionals, this research develops a theoretical framework integrating multiple dimensions into the analysis of M&amp;amp;A deals. The framework is applied to a case study of the contentious merger between French utility giants Veolia and Suez, highlighting the complexities and trade-offs involved in evaluating deals in the water and waste management sector.&#xd;
&#xd;
The findings underscore the importance of comprehensive impact assessments, robust stakeholder engagement, and long-term value creation strategies. The Veolia Suez case reveals the need for effective risk management and the potential for synergies and unintended consequences in large financial deals.&#xd;
Ultimately, this thesis argues that a holistic approach to impact assessment enables informed decision-making, promoting sustainable growth and safeguarding societal and environmental interests. The proposed framework offers a roadmap for enhancing practices and fostering a more responsible approach to financial transactions.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>