<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T02:18:25Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/156046" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/156046</identifier><datestamp>2024-08-13T03:19:26Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Whyte, Dennis G.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Roemer, Thomas</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Murphy, Daniel T.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Sloan School of Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2024-08-12T14:17:36Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2024-08-12T14:17:36Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2024-05</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="submitted">2024-06-25T18:15:35.059Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/156046</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">To achieve commercial viability, Commonwealth Fusion System’s ARC device must maximize its availability to produce power, thus demanding a rapid maintenance process to replace radiation-damaged components. Designing robotic systems to&#xd;
operate in this radiation environment requires understanding the expected radiation levels and how design decisions impact those levels. This thesis uses the Rigorous Two-Step (R2S) methodology to scope the radiation environment and provide data for those design trade-offs that must be considered in future ARC design iterations. The first trend is Vanadium’s lower dose rate than Eurofer as a Vacuum Vessel and Blanket&#xd;
Tank material in all configurations, making it the preferred candidate from a radiation perspective. Second, the model indicates that the choice in Blanket Tank material contributes non-trivially to the maintenance radiation environment. Third, the trends demonstrate minimal additional reduction in radiation levels from delaying the start of maintenance beyond 14 days after fusion ceases. The final trend shows the reduction&#xd;
in the radiation field from the removal of the Blanket Tank with the Vacuum Vessel warrants future study. Finally, this thesis incorporates historical nuclear robotics experience to establish an iterative process by which to develop robotic radiation&#xd;
requirements and assess maintenance decision effects on ARC-level optimality.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree">M.B.A.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">Copyright retained by author(s)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri">https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title">Shutdown Dose Rate Modeling for Radiation Requirements Development and Design Trend Analysis in the ARC Fusion Device</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="degree">Master</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name">Master of Science in Nuclear Science and Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name">Master of Business Administration</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="b2518152-b309-4fc7-9230-86dcf28dca0a">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
   	&lt;Title>Shutdown Dose Rate Modeling for Radiation Requirements Development and Design Trend Analysis in the ARC Fusion Device&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2024-05&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors&gt;
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Murphy, Daniel T.&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/&lt;/License>
   	&lt;Abstract>To achieve commercial viability, Commonwealth Fusion System’s ARC device must maximize its availability to produce power, thus demanding a rapid maintenance process to replace radiation-damaged components. Designing robotic systems to&#xd;
operate in this radiation environment requires understanding the expected radiation levels and how design decisions impact those levels. This thesis uses the Rigorous Two-Step (R2S) methodology to scope the radiation environment and provide data for those design trade-offs that must be considered in future ARC design iterations. The first trend is Vanadium’s lower dose rate than Eurofer as a Vacuum Vessel and Blanket&#xd;
Tank material in all configurations, making it the preferred candidate from a radiation perspective. Second, the model indicates that the choice in Blanket Tank material contributes non-trivially to the maintenance radiation environment. Third, the trends demonstrate minimal additional reduction in radiation levels from delaying the start of maintenance beyond 14 days after fusion ceases. The final trend shows the reduction&#xd;
in the radiation field from the removal of the Blanket Tank with the Vacuum Vessel warrants future study. Finally, this thesis incorporates historical nuclear robotics experience to establish an iterative process by which to develop robotic radiation&#xd;
requirements and assess maintenance decision effects on ARC-level optimality.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>