<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T18:17:20Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/162071" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/162071</identifier><datestamp>2025-07-30T03:07:36Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">D'Ignazio, Catherine</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Xu, Ziqing (Becky)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2025-07-29T17:16:14Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2025-07-29T17:16:14Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2025-05</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="submitted">2025-06-05T13:42:58.198Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/162071</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">The credibility of voluntary carbon markets hinges on the quality of carbon offset projects, particularly in forestry and land-use sectors where claims of additionality and emissions reductions are often disputed. This paper introduces a novel, open-source approach to evaluating carbon offset projects by integrating open datasets, satellite-based remote sensing, and large language models (LLMs). Focusing on additionality and baseline integrity, the study examines existing challenges—including inflated baselines, inconsistent standards, leakage risks, and limited transparency—and proposes a system to automate early-stage project assessment. The platform combines AI-driven document analysis and geospatial data processing to evaluate risk factors such as additionality, leakage, and policy compliance, offering stakeholders an accessible, scalable tool to identify high-integrity carbon credits and mitigate greenwashing. This work aims to enhance transparency, accountability, and trust in the voluntary carbon market through data-driven, user-friendly decision support.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree">M.C.P.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">Copyright retained by author(s)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri">https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title">Analyzing Risks in Voluntary Forest Carbon Offsets Using Open Data: A Hybrid Framework Integrating Retrieval-Augmented Generation in LLMs and Geospatial Analytics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="degree">Master</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name">Master in City Planning</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="f92a8e26-8db8-46d3-a204-6a1bde96552b">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
   	&lt;Title>Analyzing Risks in Voluntary Forest Carbon Offsets Using Open Data: A Hybrid Framework Integrating Retrieval-Augmented Generation in LLMs and Geospatial Analytics&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2025-05&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Xu, Ziqing (Becky)&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/&lt;/License>
   	&lt;Abstract>The credibility of voluntary carbon markets hinges on the quality of carbon offset projects, particularly in forestry and land-use sectors where claims of additionality and emissions reductions are often disputed. This paper introduces a novel, open-source approach to evaluating carbon offset projects by integrating open datasets, satellite-based remote sensing, and large language models (LLMs). Focusing on additionality and baseline integrity, the study examines existing challenges—including inflated baselines, inconsistent standards, leakage risks, and limited transparency—and proposes a system to automate early-stage project assessment. The platform combines AI-driven document analysis and geospatial data processing to evaluate risk factors such as additionality, leakage, and policy compliance, offering stakeholders an accessible, scalable tool to identify high-integrity carbon credits and mitigate greenwashing. This work aims to enhance transparency, accountability, and trust in the voluntary carbon market through data-driven, user-friendly decision support.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>