<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T15:40:54Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/162103" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/162103</identifier><datestamp>2025-07-30T03:08:15Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Ryan, Brent</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Jones, Rubin</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2025-07-29T17:17:58Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2025-07-29T17:17:58Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2025-05</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="submitted">2025-06-05T13:43:50.859Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/162103</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">Contemporary planning often invokes a “sense of place,” yet the deeper work of placemaking remains largely unfulfilled. In its absence, cities and regions fracture into landscapes that appear whole but feel hollow. These are spaces stripped of the sensory depth and symbolic meaning that make dwelling possible. This thesis thus returns to the concept of the genius loci—the spirit of place—not as a nostalgic embellishment, but as an ethical and practical imperative. It traces the philosophical and historical foundations of place, examines how contemporary practice has diluted its meaning, and explains why a new approach is necessary. From this foundation, the project engages Kevin Lynch’s operational models and develops a reframed approach—shifting from a visual image to an embodied experience—to ground planning practice in the textures of memory, movement, and belonging. Five new concepts—anchor, patch, joint, seam, and trail—offer a vocabulary for cultivating places that hold meaning across time and transformation. This framework is applied in Northwest Arkansas, a region where rapid growth threatens to outpace the character of its communities. By strengthening sensory experience, rooted memory, and collective authorship, this project aims to offer a different way forward through regional transit—where planning not only shapes space, but safeguards access to the ongoing, unfinished project of place itself.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree">M.C.P.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">Copyright retained by author(s)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri">https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title">Ozarkitecture: Shaping the Sense of a Region</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="mit" element="thesis" qualifier="degree">Master</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name">Master in City Planning</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="df6f90f4-875f-4f3e-aad8-69328ecdbfbf">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
   	&lt;Title>Ozarkitecture: Shaping the Sense of a Region&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2025-05&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Jones, Rubin&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/&lt;/License>
   	&lt;Abstract>Contemporary planning often invokes a “sense of place,” yet the deeper work of placemaking remains largely unfulfilled. In its absence, cities and regions fracture into landscapes that appear whole but feel hollow. These are spaces stripped of the sensory depth and symbolic meaning that make dwelling possible. This thesis thus returns to the concept of the genius loci—the spirit of place—not as a nostalgic embellishment, but as an ethical and practical imperative. It traces the philosophical and historical foundations of place, examines how contemporary practice has diluted its meaning, and explains why a new approach is necessary. From this foundation, the project engages Kevin Lynch’s operational models and develops a reframed approach—shifting from a visual image to an embodied experience—to ground planning practice in the textures of memory, movement, and belonging. Five new concepts—anchor, patch, joint, seam, and trail—offer a vocabulary for cultivating places that hold meaning across time and transformation. This framework is applied in Northwest Arkansas, a region where rapid growth threatens to outpace the character of its communities. By strengthening sensory experience, rooted memory, and collective authorship, this project aims to offer a different way forward through regional transit—where planning not only shapes space, but safeguards access to the ongoing, unfinished project of place itself.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>