2026-09-20T03:30:30Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/1625242025-08-28T03:07:02Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023
Buongiorno, Jacopo
Balla, Sai Prasad
System Design and Management Program.
2025-08-27T14:31:19Z
2025-08-27T14:31:19Z
2025-05
2025-06-20T18:49:40.973Z
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/162524
This study provides a comprehensive techno-economic evaluation of a specific class of nuclear batteries—high-temperature gas-cooled 10 MW_th microreactors (HTGRs) with TRISO fuel in prismatic- and pebble-bed cores—using four composite moderator concepts (MgO–Be, MgO–BeO, MgO–YH, MgO–ZrH). These options are compared against a prismatic graphite benchmark, under both once-through and continuous-recycle fuel cycles.
In once-through prismatic systems, hydride-based moderators can reduce overall fuel-cycle costs by up to about 20% relative to graphite, whereas beryllium-based moderators may remain 40–50% costlier due to higher raw material expenses. Shifting from prismatic blocks to pebble beds decreases moderator usage and increases burnup, thus making advanced moderator options more competitive.
Adopting a continuous-recycle strategy replaces enrichment with reprocessing and can further lower fuel-cycle costs by roughly 30%. Coupling a sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) to supply transuranic’s further reduces the cost: SFR driver fabrication and reprocessing can account for the bulk of total costs, rendering microreactor-level variations comparatively minor. Meanwhile, pebble-bed designs propose ultra-high burnups and extended residence times, which could yield significant economic gains, contingent on demonstrated long-term TRISO fuel integrity.
Waste handling also factors into the analysis. Deconsolidation—removing the inert moderator before disposal—can shrink spent-fuel volumes by more than 90%, easing repository demands. Continued R&D into advanced additive manufacturing, high-burnup TRISO performance, and streamlined waste management will be crucial for capitalizing on these potential cost advantages.
S.M.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted
Copyright retained by author(s)
https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/
Levelized Cost of Fuel (LCOF) studies for microreactors using TRISO
fuel in hydride and beryllium-based composite moderators in open
and closed fuel cycles
Thesis
application/pdf
Master
Master of Science in Engineering and Management
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="c1718f5e-76cd-4ce1-8124-0e2f56ca2c6e">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Title>Levelized Cost of Fuel (LCOF) studies for microreactors using TRISO
fuel in hydride and beryllium-based composite moderators in open
and closed fuel cycles</Title>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>2025-05</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Balla, Sai Prasad</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/</License>
<Abstract>This study provides a comprehensive techno-economic evaluation of a specific class of nuclear batteries—high-temperature gas-cooled 10 MW_th microreactors (HTGRs) with TRISO fuel in prismatic- and pebble-bed cores—using four composite moderator concepts (MgO–Be, MgO–BeO, MgO–YH, MgO–ZrH). These options are compared against a prismatic graphite benchmark, under both once-through and continuous-recycle fuel cycles.
In once-through prismatic systems, hydride-based moderators can reduce overall fuel-cycle costs by up to about 20% relative to graphite, whereas beryllium-based moderators may remain 40–50% costlier due to higher raw material expenses. Shifting from prismatic blocks to pebble beds decreases moderator usage and increases burnup, thus making advanced moderator options more competitive.
Adopting a continuous-recycle strategy replaces enrichment with reprocessing and can further lower fuel-cycle costs by roughly 30%. Coupling a sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) to supply transuranic’s further reduces the cost: SFR driver fabrication and reprocessing can account for the bulk of total costs, rendering microreactor-level variations comparatively minor. Meanwhile, pebble-bed designs propose ultra-high burnups and extended residence times, which could yield significant economic gains, contingent on demonstrated long-term TRISO fuel integrity.
Waste handling also factors into the analysis. Deconsolidation—removing the inert moderator before disposal—can shrink spent-fuel volumes by more than 90%, easing repository demands. Continued R&D into advanced additive manufacturing, high-burnup TRISO performance, and streamlined waste management will be crucial for capitalizing on these potential cost advantages.</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>