<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-22T15:34:00Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/17476" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/17476</identifier><datestamp>2021-07-05T14:03:20Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Edward B. Roberts.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Bornstein, Bruce Alan</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department" lang="en_US">Sloan School of Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2005-06-02T15:23:35Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2005-06-02T15:23:35Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">1999</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">1999</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/17476</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">42751231</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 1999.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (leaves 89-90).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">The level of entrepreneurship and commercialization of inventions at universities in the United States varies widely. This study attempts to uncover the factors that may explain the differences in the attitude toward entrepreneurship and commercialization found at academic institutions. To this end nineteen interviews with faculty researchers, inventors, entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, technology transfer officers, and others were conducted. The different perceptions toward entrepreneurship and commercialization at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard University, and Harvard Medical School and its associated research hospitals were examined with particular care. Several factors that are significant in promoting entrepreneurship and interest in the commercialization of ideas were identified. Although these factors may account for the observed differences, no one factor was singled out as being the most important. These factors include the presence of mentors and role models, the composition of the institution's intellectual property, cultural differences, the conflict of interest policy, a critical mass of people, the technology transfer process, and the availability of university venture funds. Many of those interviewed believed that the nature of intellectual property and accessibility to mentors and role models by the researchers and inventors were probably the most significant of all factors for enhancing entrepreneurship.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Bruce A. Bornstein.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">M.B.A.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">94 leaves</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent">4644043 bytes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent">4653311 bytes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Sloan School of Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Commercializing university biomedical ideas : problems and opportunities</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="62b1559d-cba7-4639-beac-73fe1197aa52">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Commercializing university biomedical ideas : problems and opportunities&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>1999&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Bornstein, Bruce Alan&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Sloan School of Management&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>The level of entrepreneurship and commercialization of inventions at universities in the United States varies widely. This study attempts to uncover the factors that may explain the differences in the attitude toward entrepreneurship and commercialization found at academic institutions. To this end nineteen interviews with faculty researchers, inventors, entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, technology transfer officers, and others were conducted. The different perceptions toward entrepreneurship and commercialization at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard University, and Harvard Medical School and its associated research hospitals were examined with particular care. Several factors that are significant in promoting entrepreneurship and interest in the commercialization of ideas were identified. Although these factors may account for the observed differences, no one factor was singled out as being the most important. These factors include the presence of mentors and role models, the composition of the institution&amp;apos;s intellectual property, cultural differences, the conflict of interest policy, a critical mass of people, the technology transfer process, and the availability of university venture funds. Many of those interviewed believed that the nature of intellectual property and accessibility to mentors and role models by the researchers and inventors were probably the most significant of all factors for enhancing entrepreneurship.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>