<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T13:48:53Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/28920" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/28920</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:31Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131022</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Morris Halle.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Nevins, Andrew</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2005-09-27T19:04:14Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2005-09-27T19:04:14Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2005</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2005</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/28920</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">60503647</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2005.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (p. 291-308).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">(cont.) Chapter 4 turns to microvariation within the (dis)harmony system of a single language, examining transparency variation in Hungarian front vowels, and distance-based variation in Hungarian neutral vowel sequences, and in the dissimilative voicing of Embu prefixes. The proposal is that variation results from structural ambiguity within analytic possibilities in the hypothesis space developed in Chapters 1-3. When a configuration encountered early in the learning sequence is compatible with multiple (dis)harmony policies (i.e. parametric settings of harmony grammars), the speaker may choose among these, resulting in variation on those later-learned forms for which the policies diverge in their output.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">This thesis explores the formal principles and parameters that model the space of attested, unattested, and microvarying patterns of vowel and consonant harmony. The proposal begins with a target-centric theory, in which harmony is the result of a Search, initiated by a segment "in need". Chapter 1 offers comparison with autosegmental, spreading-based models, arguing that the present model provides an explanatory account of locality effects in "non-constituent" copying in Turkish, Barra Gaelic, and Woleaian. It is proposed that harmony and dissimilation are conducted by the same mechanism--because both display intervener-based locality, and parametric bounds on the domain of search--and that they differ formally only in their structural change. Interveners, excluded from the relativized search domain, may stand between target and source, but search inviolably halts at the closest element within the domain. Chapter 2 proposes that the visibility conditions on interveners can be predicted by properties of contrastiveness within the inventory. Nonetheless, within closely-related languages, microparametrization of value-relativization may lead to dramatic differences in surface harmony patterns. Exemplification comes from three case studies: Standard Yoruba and Ife Yoruba; Sibe and Sanjiazi Manchu; and Kyrghyz, Karaim, and Turkish. Chapter 3 demonstrates that the typology of possible harmony systems has an additional (parametric) determinant: relative sonority. An implicational generalization is proposed: no language has a transparent unpaired vowel of high sonority at the same time it has an opaque unpaired vowel of lower sonority. Exemplification through Hungarian, Wolof, Finnish, and Written Manchu unites seemingly distinct cases of sonority-based</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Andrew Ira Nevins.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">Ph.D.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">308 p.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent">16569031 bytes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent">16611024 bytes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso">en_US</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Linguistics and Philosophy.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Conditions on (dis)harmony</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="c7edabc5-7ec2-42c6-b064-d47944ddcc71">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>en_US&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Conditions on (dis)harmony&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2005&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Nevins, Andrew&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Linguistics and Philosophy.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>(cont.) Chapter 4 turns to microvariation within the (dis)harmony system of a single language, examining transparency variation in Hungarian front vowels, and distance-based variation in Hungarian neutral vowel sequences, and in the dissimilative voicing of Embu prefixes. The proposal is that variation results from structural ambiguity within analytic possibilities in the hypothesis space developed in Chapters 1-3. When a configuration encountered early in the learning sequence is compatible with multiple (dis)harmony policies (i.e. parametric settings of harmony grammars), the speaker may choose among these, resulting in variation on those later-learned forms for which the policies diverge in their output.&lt;/Abstract>
   	&lt;Abstract>This thesis explores the formal principles and parameters that model the space of attested, unattested, and microvarying patterns of vowel and consonant harmony. The proposal begins with a target-centric theory, in which harmony is the result of a Search, initiated by a segment &amp;quot;in need&amp;quot;. Chapter 1 offers comparison with autosegmental, spreading-based models, arguing that the present model provides an explanatory account of locality effects in &amp;quot;non-constituent&amp;quot; copying in Turkish, Barra Gaelic, and Woleaian. It is proposed that harmony and dissimilation are conducted by the same mechanism--because both display intervener-based locality, and parametric bounds on the domain of search--and that they differ formally only in their structural change. Interveners, excluded from the relativized search domain, may stand between target and source, but search inviolably halts at the closest element within the domain. Chapter 2 proposes that the visibility conditions on interveners can be predicted by properties of contrastiveness within the inventory. Nonetheless, within closely-related languages, microparametrization of value-relativization may lead to dramatic differences in surface harmony patterns. Exemplification comes from three case studies: Standard Yoruba and Ife Yoruba; Sibe and Sanjiazi Manchu; and Kyrghyz, Karaim, and Turkish. Chapter 3 demonstrates that the typology of possible harmony systems has an additional (parametric) determinant: relative sonority. An implicational generalization is proposed: no language has a transparent unpaired vowel of high sonority at the same time it has an opaque unpaired vowel of lower sonority. Exemplification through Hungarian, Wolof, Finnish, and Written Manchu unites seemingly distinct cases of sonority-based&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>