<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T16:56:09Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/32856" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/32856</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:33Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131024</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Francesco Stellacci.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Tong, Angela, 1983-</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2006-05-15T20:34:58Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2006-05-15T20:34:58Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2005</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2005</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/32856</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">61490376</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, 2005.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (leaf 23).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">Technology today is directed towards building smaller devices. To accommodate this development, printing methods are needed. Some printing methods that are used include lithography, micro-contact printing, and inkjet printing. These methods all require specialized instrumentation, hazardous chemicals, and complicated and tedious steps that increase cost of manufacturing. Nano-contact printing is an alternative solution which relies on the specificity of DNA to direct molecules into precise patterns. This study attempts to find the limitations of nano-contact printing through the printing of oligonucleotide monolayers. Eight pattern transfers were made with one master copy and the oligonucleotide surface coverage was analyzed using tapping mode atomic force microscopy (AFM). The percent coverage of oligonucleotide was then calculated from the tapping mode AFM phase images. Two general trends were found. The oligonucleotide surface coverage on the master increased slightly, while the surface coverage on the pattern transfers decreased. One possible explanation for the trends is that the decrease in contact between master and secondary substrate is due to both the accumulation of dirt and the wear and tear of' the master. By improving the contact between master and secondary substrate, the printing method can be expanded from printing monolayers to high resolution patterns.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Angela Tong.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.B.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">23 leaves</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent">991795 bytes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent">989950 bytes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Materials Science and Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Nano-contact printing of DNA monolayers</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" qualifier="alternative" lang="en_US">Nano-contact printing of deoxyribonucleic acid monolayers</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="97fa1839-a087-47bf-b1c7-0b32a288a03c">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Nano-contact printing of DNA monolayers&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;Subtitle>Nano-contact printing of deoxyribonucleic acid monolayers&lt;/Subtitle>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2005&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Tong, Angela, 1983-&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Materials Science and Engineering.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>Technology today is directed towards building smaller devices. To accommodate this development, printing methods are needed. Some printing methods that are used include lithography, micro-contact printing, and inkjet printing. These methods all require specialized instrumentation, hazardous chemicals, and complicated and tedious steps that increase cost of manufacturing. Nano-contact printing is an alternative solution which relies on the specificity of DNA to direct molecules into precise patterns. This study attempts to find the limitations of nano-contact printing through the printing of oligonucleotide monolayers. Eight pattern transfers were made with one master copy and the oligonucleotide surface coverage was analyzed using tapping mode atomic force microscopy (AFM). The percent coverage of oligonucleotide was then calculated from the tapping mode AFM phase images. Two general trends were found. The oligonucleotide surface coverage on the master increased slightly, while the surface coverage on the pattern transfers decreased. One possible explanation for the trends is that the decrease in contact between master and secondary substrate is due to both the accumulation of dirt and the wear and tear of&amp;apos; the master. By improving the contact between master and secondary substrate, the printing method can be expanded from printing monolayers to high resolution patterns.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>