2026-09-21T08:35:33Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/336182022-01-13T07:54:33Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023
Randolph E. Kirchain, Jr.
Povelaites, Jeffrey C
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering
2006-07-31T15:17:32Z
2006-07-31T15:17:32Z
2005
2005
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33618
64391183
Thesis (M. Eng.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, 2005.
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 58-59).
Consumer demand is hard to predict in any industry, let alone the automotive industry. Vehicle manufacturers try to produce according to what their customers want, but if these wants change, the company is faced with lots of unsold cars and a huge changeover cost. In order to help fight the problems of demand variability, automotive manufacturers have begun the move towards plant flexibility. This includes designing vehicles comprised of similar subassemblies and the development of flexible tooling. The hope is that multiple vehicles can be produced on the same line so if demand starts to fluctuate, they can change the production levels of their styles with minimal lead time. There are a number of different approaches to flexible tooling. One approach using programmable robotic repositionable tools (PRRT) is particularly promising because it can handle a large number of styles and requires low style specific reinvestment costs. This thesis examines the PRRT technology as well as other forms of flexible tooling to understand the conditions under which these approaches make the most economic sense.
(cont.) For this project an algorithm was developed to choose assembly tools based on subassembly characteristics, production levels, style counts, and flexibility approaches. The algorithm was connected to an already existing vehicle assembly model and two forms of economic analysis were performed. The first looked at the costs of using PRRT versus other forms of tooling for various product mixes. The second analyzed the potential cost savings when considering product changeover. The results indicated that the initial outlays for PRRTs cannot be justified even for a large number of styles unless multi-generational product changeover is also considered. However, PRRTs provide a cost effective flexible tooling option for plants producing multiple styles when considering product changeovers.
by Jeffrey C. Povelaites.
M.Eng.
59 leaves
3951247 bytes
3953636 bytes
application/pdf
application/pdf
eng
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Materials Science and Engineering.
Characterizing cost and performance of flexibility strategies in autobody manufacturing
Thesis
application/pdf
false
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="b6a7696e-a987-499e-bca9-b339ce8d0068">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Language>eng</Language>
<Title>Characterizing cost and performance of flexibility strategies in autobody manufacturing</Title>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>2005</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Povelaites, Jeffrey C</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License>
<Keyword>Materials Science and Engineering.</Keyword>
<Abstract>Consumer demand is hard to predict in any industry, let alone the automotive industry. Vehicle manufacturers try to produce according to what their customers want, but if these wants change, the company is faced with lots of unsold cars and a huge changeover cost. In order to help fight the problems of demand variability, automotive manufacturers have begun the move towards plant flexibility. This includes designing vehicles comprised of similar subassemblies and the development of flexible tooling. The hope is that multiple vehicles can be produced on the same line so if demand starts to fluctuate, they can change the production levels of their styles with minimal lead time. There are a number of different approaches to flexible tooling. One approach using programmable robotic repositionable tools (PRRT) is particularly promising because it can handle a large number of styles and requires low style specific reinvestment costs. This thesis examines the PRRT technology as well as other forms of flexible tooling to understand the conditions under which these approaches make the most economic sense.</Abstract>
<Abstract>(cont.) For this project an algorithm was developed to choose assembly tools based on subassembly characteristics, production levels, style counts, and flexibility approaches. The algorithm was connected to an already existing vehicle assembly model and two forms of economic analysis were performed. The first looked at the costs of using PRRT versus other forms of tooling for various product mixes. The second analyzed the potential cost savings when considering product changeover. The results indicated that the initial outlays for PRRTs cannot be justified even for a large number of styles unless multi-generational product changeover is also considered. However, PRRTs provide a cost effective flexible tooling option for plants producing multiple styles when considering product changeovers.</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>