2026-09-21T06:08:08Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request

oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/417642022-02-01T14:52:53Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023

Richard Locke and John Sterman. Cameron, Diane (Melissa Jessica Diane) Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Technology and Policy Program. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division Technology and Policy Program 2008-05-19T16:15:38Z 2008-05-19T16:15:38Z 2007 2007 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/41764 226294215 Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program, 2007. Includes bibliographical references (p. 171-179). Globalization is changing the way in which the world is organized. The world trade regime is increasingly the dominant mode of organizing international relations. Within this context of globalization and liberalization of trade, empirical examples of a race to the bottom co-exist with examples of a race to the top and examples of stable heterogeneity of international standards. The puzzle, then, is to determine the structural conditions, sources of power, and policy instruments that determine whether international standards will diverge or converge, upward or downward. This research seeks to reveal the potential for (and limitations of) a race to the top in international standards. System dynamics modeling and theories of globalization and regulatory competition are applied to three case studies to explore the causes of a race to the top: the Montreal Protocol on Ozone Depleting Substances, dolphin-safe tuna, and fair trade coffee. Many of the concerns of a race to the bottom pertain to process and production methods (PPMs) in global supply chains. One of the themes in this research is the distinction between standards based on the characteristics of a product and standards based on the process and production methods (PPMs) used to produce the product. Whereas product standards can be monitored and enforced at the point of market access, PPM standards must be monitored and enforced at the site of production, which can be problematic in global supply chains. This research seeks to elucidate the sources of power and policy levers available to promote higher PPM standards within the context of globalization and the liberalization of trade. (cont.) A set of theories from international law and political economy is selected to create a theoretical framework for analyzing the effects of globalization on international standards. In particular, theories of corporate power, corporate social responsibility, norm change and consumer power elucidate the potential and limitations of voluntary standards. Theories of regulatory capture and competition inform the question of how voluntary standards translate into public policy. The goal is to understand how social and environmental objectives can be promoted within the context of liberalized trade. by Diane Cameron. S.M. 179 p. eng Massachusetts Institute of Technology M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 Technology and Policy Program. Globalization and standards : the liberalization of trade and the potential for a regulatory race to the top Liberalization of trade and the potential for a regulatory race to the top Thesis application/pdf Publication unknown unknown <Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="a0a1864f-8bc2-44e0-af75-7117e05ddfdf"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>Globalization and standards : the liberalization of trade and the potential for a regulatory race to the top</Title> <Subtitle>Liberalization of trade and the potential for a regulatory race to the top</Subtitle> <PublishedIn> <Publication> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2007</PublicationDate> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Cameron, Diane (Melissa Jessica Diane)</DisplayName> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License> <Keyword>Technology and Policy Program.</Keyword> <Abstract>Globalization is changing the way in which the world is organized. The world trade regime is increasingly the dominant mode of organizing international relations. Within this context of globalization and liberalization of trade, empirical examples of a race to the bottom co-exist with examples of a race to the top and examples of stable heterogeneity of international standards. The puzzle, then, is to determine the structural conditions, sources of power, and policy instruments that determine whether international standards will diverge or converge, upward or downward. This research seeks to reveal the potential for (and limitations of) a race to the top in international standards. System dynamics modeling and theories of globalization and regulatory competition are applied to three case studies to explore the causes of a race to the top: the Montreal Protocol on Ozone Depleting Substances, dolphin-safe tuna, and fair trade coffee. Many of the concerns of a race to the bottom pertain to process and production methods (PPMs) in global supply chains. One of the themes in this research is the distinction between standards based on the characteristics of a product and standards based on the process and production methods (PPMs) used to produce the product. Whereas product standards can be monitored and enforced at the point of market access, PPM standards must be monitored and enforced at the site of production, which can be problematic in global supply chains. This research seeks to elucidate the sources of power and policy levers available to promote higher PPM standards within the context of globalization and the liberalization of trade.</Abstract> <Abstract>(cont.) A set of theories from international law and political economy is selected to create a theoretical framework for analyzing the effects of globalization on international standards. In particular, theories of corporate power, corporate social responsibility, norm change and consumer power elucidate the potential and limitations of voluntary standards. Theories of regulatory capture and competition inform the question of how voluntary standards translate into public policy. The goal is to understand how social and environmental objectives can be promoted within the context of liberalized trade.</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication>