<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T02:34:49Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/45261" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/45261</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:11Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Jeffrey A. Hoffman.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Cunio, Phillip M</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2009-04-29T17:16:50Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2009-04-29T17:16:50Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2008</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2008</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45261</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">310368404</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2008.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (leaves 186-192).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">Commonality, defined practically as the use of similar technologies to deliver similar functions across a range of different complex systems, offers opportunities to improve the lifecycle costs of portfolios of complex systems. In this thesis, a proposed methodology for commonality analysis is tested by application to a portfolio of life support systems for planetary surface exploration. A database of environmental control and life support technology is developed and presented, and sets of system architectures for environmental control and life support systems are generated by models using the Object-Process Network (OPN) meta-language, which integrates information from the database. System architectures are downselected to a few interesting architectures, from which interesting potential portfolios are created, and commonality analysis is applied to these portfolios of complex environmental control and life support systems. The applied commonality analysis methodology estimates the total equivalent campaign mass to be transported to the planetary surface for exploration, the development cost of the necessary equipment, the mass of spares required by the equipment, and the number of unique items to be developed at various Technology Readiness Levels. Based on these analyses, recommendations for further technology development and appropriate commonality levels in future portfolios of complex systems are presented, and a summary of desirable future work concludes the thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Phillip M. Cunio.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">195 leaves</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by 
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but 
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written 
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Aeronautics and Astronautics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Commonality analysis for exploration life support systems</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="1d92e5dc-0382-4988-9738-678e47b9969f">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Commonality analysis for exploration life support systems&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2008&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Cunio, Phillip M&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Aeronautics and Astronautics.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>Commonality, defined practically as the use of similar technologies to deliver similar functions across a range of different complex systems, offers opportunities to improve the lifecycle costs of portfolios of complex systems. In this thesis, a proposed methodology for commonality analysis is tested by application to a portfolio of life support systems for planetary surface exploration. A database of environmental control and life support technology is developed and presented, and sets of system architectures for environmental control and life support systems are generated by models using the Object-Process Network (OPN) meta-language, which integrates information from the database. System architectures are downselected to a few interesting architectures, from which interesting potential portfolios are created, and commonality analysis is applied to these portfolios of complex environmental control and life support systems. The applied commonality analysis methodology estimates the total equivalent campaign mass to be transported to the planetary surface for exploration, the development cost of the necessary equipment, the mass of spares required by the equipment, and the number of unique items to be developed at various Technology Readiness Levels. Based on these analyses, recommendations for further technology development and appropriate commonality levels in future portfolios of complex systems are presented, and a summary of desirable future work concludes the thesis.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>