<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T13:09:33Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/45917" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/45917</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:28Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131022</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Ricardo Caballero and Guido Lorenzoni.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Brandão, Tatiana Glindmeier Didier</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2009-06-30T16:37:48Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2009-06-30T16:37:48Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2008</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2008</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45917</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">320774920</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics, 2008.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">This dissertation consists of three chapters on international capital flows. Chapter 1 emphasizes the importance of innovations in the investment opportunity set, captured by changes in expected asset returns, as an important mechanism to explain international capital flows. More specifically, it analyzes the implications of time-varying portfolio shares on the dynamics of the current account. The predictions of a partial-equilibrium model of the current account, with dynamic portfolio choices, are evaluated using data for the U.S. and Japan. We show that variations in investment opportunities change agents' optimal portfolios in a direction consistent with the actual bilateral current account movements. Chapter 2 focuses on two questions related to international investment and access to international capital markets. First, does the structural change in the U.S. mutual fund industry toward more "aggregation" (favoring funds that invest globally over funds that invest in specific countries or regions) affect firms in other countries? And second, are investors forgoing gains from international diversification by shifting toward more global funds? The empirical evidence presented suggests that the answer is yes to both questions. Chapter 3 investigates the relation between information asymmetries and institutional investor mandate. The results suggest that information asymmetries vary across institutional investor mandates, being significantly more pronounced for funds with broader mandates.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Tatiana Glindmeier Didier Brandão.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">Ph.D.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">173 p.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by 
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but 
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written 
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Economics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Essays on international capital flows</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="80a5e821-86ab-42a3-b7ba-9f9a6340c5fc">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Essays on international capital flows&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2008&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Brandão, Tatiana Glindmeier Didier&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Economics.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>This dissertation consists of three chapters on international capital flows. Chapter 1 emphasizes the importance of innovations in the investment opportunity set, captured by changes in expected asset returns, as an important mechanism to explain international capital flows. More specifically, it analyzes the implications of time-varying portfolio shares on the dynamics of the current account. The predictions of a partial-equilibrium model of the current account, with dynamic portfolio choices, are evaluated using data for the U.S. and Japan. We show that variations in investment opportunities change agents&amp;apos; optimal portfolios in a direction consistent with the actual bilateral current account movements. Chapter 2 focuses on two questions related to international investment and access to international capital markets. First, does the structural change in the U.S. mutual fund industry toward more &amp;quot;aggregation&amp;quot; (favoring funds that invest globally over funds that invest in specific countries or regions) affect firms in other countries? And second, are investors forgoing gains from international diversification by shifting toward more global funds? The empirical evidence presented suggests that the answer is yes to both questions. Chapter 3 investigates the relation between information asymmetries and institutional investor mandate. The results suggest that information asymmetries vary across institutional investor mandates, being significantly more pronounced for funds with broader mandates.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>