<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T19:22:33Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/50127" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/50127</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-26T16:39:21Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Peter Griffith.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Quintana, Michael Steven</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2009-12-10T19:16:22Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2009-12-10T19:16:22Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">1998</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">1998</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/50127</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">50587639</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Nuclear Engineering; and, (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, 1998.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (leaf 36).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">The objectives of this research are to evaluate the performance of a flow-splitting tripod, discover the factors which most affect the flow distribution; and quantify the effects of geometry, quality and flow rate on the distribution. Knowing all this allows one to predict the distribution for given conditions. An R-22 test apparatus was constructed for carrying out the experiments. The factors examined were tripod orientation, Froude number, void fraction, and swirl induced by helical grooves in the tube supplying the two-phase flow to the tripod. The flow regime of concern is primarily annular. Experiments were run and data was collected and analyzed. The two piece tripods were generally found to have manufacturing defects which made their performance unpredictable. The hole through which the flow was provided was often off center. This defect greatly affected the distribution and masked other geometric factors. To eliminate this variable a number of tripods were tested, using an air-water rig, to find a tripod that was not defective. Tests using R-22 were then run on this tripod and it was found that inlet swirl had little or no affect on the flow distribution. The factors that had the greatest effect on the flow distribution were the tripod's orientation, the Froude number of the flow, and the void fraction. An empirical correlation for flow splitting was derived including these factors.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Michael Steven Quintana.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">59 leaves</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by &#xd;
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but &#xd;
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written &#xd;
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Nuclear Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Mechanical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Two phase flow splitting in piping branches</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" qualifier="alternative" lang="en_US">2 phase flow splitting in piping branches</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="ff8b6a48-8281-49fd-9477-4e14aecbbc8a">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Two phase flow splitting in piping branches&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;Subtitle>2 phase flow splitting in piping branches&lt;/Subtitle>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>1998&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Quintana, Michael Steven&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Nuclear Engineering.&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Mechanical Engineering.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>The objectives of this research are to evaluate the performance of a flow-splitting tripod, discover the factors which most affect the flow distribution; and quantify the effects of geometry, quality and flow rate on the distribution. Knowing all this allows one to predict the distribution for given conditions. An R-22 test apparatus was constructed for carrying out the experiments. The factors examined were tripod orientation, Froude number, void fraction, and swirl induced by helical grooves in the tube supplying the two-phase flow to the tripod. The flow regime of concern is primarily annular. Experiments were run and data was collected and analyzed. The two piece tripods were generally found to have manufacturing defects which made their performance unpredictable. The hole through which the flow was provided was often off center. This defect greatly affected the distribution and masked other geometric factors. To eliminate this variable a number of tripods were tested, using an air-water rig, to find a tripod that was not defective. Tests using R-22 were then run on this tripod and it was found that inlet swirl had little or no affect on the flow distribution. The factors that had the greatest effect on the flow distribution were the tripod&amp;apos;s orientation, the Froude number of the flow, and the void fraction. An empirical correlation for flow splitting was derived including these factors.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>