<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T23:53:55Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/54495" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/54495</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:36Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131024</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Anette E. Hosoi.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Shieh, Sarah</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2010-04-28T15:42:13Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2010-04-28T15:42:13Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2009</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2009</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/54495</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">558634750</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, 2009.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (p. 23-24).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">An experimental study was carried out to determine if drag reducing polymers can be simple indicators of hemolytic potential in biomechanical devices. Specifically, three different blood pumps, known as a left ventricle assist devices (LVADs) were operated in a test loop using an aqueous solution of polyethylene glycol (PEO, MW = 5000 kDa), a known drag reducing polymer. The pumps were operated under controlled parameters and the change in viscosity (cP) and drag reduction (%DR) for each pump was monitored over the specified time period. The CentriMag® (CM) was used to confirm the drag reducing behavior of PEO, while HeartMate® II (HM II) and HeartMate® III (HM III) were used to determine if there was a correlation between experimental results and actual hemolysis results. Experimental results showed that the mathematical difference between the average final and initial viscosity of HM II was greater than the difference for HM III. HM II had a difference of 0.21 cP and HM III had a difference of 0.16 cP. Hemolysis results using bovine blood showed that HM II had a higher hemolysis rate of 3.80 +/- 1.11 g/day and a higher milligram normalized index of hemolysis of 0.0393 +/- 0.0155. The average hemolysis rate for HM III was 1.38 +/- 0.63 g/day and the milligram normalized index of hemolysis (mg N.I.H.) was 0.571 +/- 0.333. This positive correlation shows that PEO can be a simple indicator of hemolytic potential for biomechanical devices. More data and experimentation is needed to further understand the behavior of PEO and it's ability to indicate hemolytic potential using a wider range of biomechanical devices.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Sarah Shieh.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.B.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">24 p.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by 
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but 
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written 
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Mechanical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Drag reducing polymers as simple indicators of hemolytic potential in biomechanical devices</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="182d39d7-8cd2-48df-8134-e205b612a631">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Drag reducing polymers as simple indicators of hemolytic potential in biomechanical devices&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2009&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Shieh, Sarah&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Mechanical Engineering.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract&gt;An experimental study was carried out to determine if drag reducing polymers can be simple indicators of hemolytic potential in biomechanical devices. Specifically, three different blood pumps, known as a left ventricle assist devices (LVADs) were operated in a test loop using an aqueous solution of polyethylene glycol (PEO, MW = 5000 kDa), a known drag reducing polymer. The pumps were operated under controlled parameters and the change in viscosity (cP) and drag reduction (%DR) for each pump was monitored over the specified time period. The CentriMag® (CM) was used to confirm the drag reducing behavior of PEO, while HeartMate® II (HM II) and HeartMate® III (HM III) were used to determine if there was a correlation between experimental results and actual hemolysis results. Experimental results showed that the mathematical difference between the average final and initial viscosity of HM II was greater than the difference for HM III. HM II had a difference of 0.21 cP and HM III had a difference of 0.16 cP. Hemolysis results using bovine blood showed that HM II had a higher hemolysis rate of 3.80 +/- 1.11 g/day and a higher milligram normalized index of hemolysis of 0.0393 +/- 0.0155. The average hemolysis rate for HM III was 1.38 +/- 0.63 g/day and the milligram normalized index of hemolysis (mg N.I.H.) was 0.571 +/- 0.333. This positive correlation shows that PEO can be a simple indicator of hemolytic potential for biomechanical devices. More data and experimentation is needed to further understand the behavior of PEO and it&amp;apos;s ability to indicate hemolytic potential using a wider range of biomechanical devices.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>