2026-09-19T13:46:06Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/576762022-01-13T07:54:33Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023
David Wallace.
Kim, Sunyoung, S.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering
2010-08-30T14:30:03Z
2010-08-30T14:30:03Z
2009
2009
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/57676
630116079
Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, 2009.
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 113).
The purpose of this research has been to improve the performances of toy projectiles by modifying their design. While the developed product is required to comply with all applicable safety specifications and regulations, it is also required to satisfy customers. Through brainstorming, over 30 designs of projectile were generated, 10 models distilled from brainstorming models were prototyped and evaluated through the performance tests. The performance tests involve distance evaluation, accuracy evaluation, safety evaluation, and supplementary evaluation. The distance evaluation is for verifying the performance of flying farther. This test measures flying distance, and initial velocity through high speed imaging, and calculates distance per kinetic energy, and drag coefficient. The accuracy evaluation indicates how accurately the each projectile model is able to fly to the aim, and it is performed by calculating the variance of the lengths between the center of the dart board and the marks which projectiles made when they bumped into the dart board. The safety evaluation is for confirming the compliance of developed models with the safety standard and it achieved with calculating the kinetic energy density. The supplementary evaluation is for comparing the production error and performing error. Through the analysis of performance tests' results, the models were modified and refined from the best performance model.
(cont.) The refined models were prototyped and evaluated through the performance tests as well. The refined model #13-1 has the same range of flight and 37.69% better accuracy than the state-of-the-art projectiles, and the refined model #13-3 has the 31.78% longer range of flight and comparable accuracy to the state-of-the-art projectiles. In conclusion, the final model was attained with specific concepts: The surface of the projectile should be smooth without bump between head and body; Two things should be avoided: too high mass because it limits the distance of flight and generates high kinetic energy density, and too low mass because it causes unsatisfied accuracy; The uniform density distribution is desired for straightness of flight; The head of the projectile should be close to streamline; The contact area should be composed with soft material that would be memory foam to protect users from injury; Stiff material not deformed by air pressure should be installed in the head and the shape of the stiff material should not sharp; The occupancy of stiff material's volume in the head should not exceed 25% of the whole volume of the head.
by Sunyoung Kim.
S.M.
113 p.
eng
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
M.I.T. theses are protected by
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Materials Science and Engineering.
Investigation of ways to make toy projectiles fly farther, straighter, and safer by adopting memory foam
Thesis
application/pdf
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="5bd063f9-3a4d-41df-b189-cbbefb81091b">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Language>eng</Language>
<Title>Investigation of ways to make toy projectiles fly farther, straighter, and safer by adopting memory foam</Title>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>2009</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Kim, Sunyoung, S.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License>
<Keyword>Materials Science and Engineering.</Keyword>
<Abstract>The purpose of this research has been to improve the performances of toy projectiles by modifying their design. While the developed product is required to comply with all applicable safety specifications and regulations, it is also required to satisfy customers. Through brainstorming, over 30 designs of projectile were generated, 10 models distilled from brainstorming models were prototyped and evaluated through the performance tests. The performance tests involve distance evaluation, accuracy evaluation, safety evaluation, and supplementary evaluation. The distance evaluation is for verifying the performance of flying farther. This test measures flying distance, and initial velocity through high speed imaging, and calculates distance per kinetic energy, and drag coefficient. The accuracy evaluation indicates how accurately the each projectile model is able to fly to the aim, and it is performed by calculating the variance of the lengths between the center of the dart board and the marks which projectiles made when they bumped into the dart board. The safety evaluation is for confirming the compliance of developed models with the safety standard and it achieved with calculating the kinetic energy density. The supplementary evaluation is for comparing the production error and performing error. Through the analysis of performance tests' results, the models were modified and refined from the best performance model.</Abstract>
<Abstract>(cont.) The refined models were prototyped and evaluated through the performance tests as well. The refined model #13-1 has the same range of flight and 37.69% better accuracy than the state-of-the-art projectiles, and the refined model #13-3 has the 31.78% longer range of flight and comparable accuracy to the state-of-the-art projectiles. In conclusion, the final model was attained with specific concepts: The surface of the projectile should be smooth without bump between head and body; Two things should be avoided: too high mass because it limits the distance of flight and generates high kinetic energy density, and too low mass because it causes unsatisfied accuracy; The uniform density distribution is desired for straightness of flight; The head of the projectile should be close to streamline; The contact area should be composed with soft material that would be memory foam to protect users from injury; Stiff material not deformed by air pressure should be installed in the head and the shape of the stiff material should not sharp; The occupancy of stiff material's volume in the head should not exceed 25% of the whole volume of the head.</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>