<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T11:01:04Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/58088" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/58088</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:41Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131024</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Dennis Whyte.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Reed, Mark W. (Mark Wilbert)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Physics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2010-09-01T16:29:03Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2010-09-01T16:29:03Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2009</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2010</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/58088</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">654107402</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Physics, June 2010.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (p. 69-70).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">We perform extensive analysis on the physics of L-mode tokamak fusion reactors to identify (1) a favorable parameter space for a large scale steady-state reactor and (2) an operating point for a minimum scale steady-state reactor. The identification of the large scale parameter space is part of the 2008 MIT Nuclear Systems Design Project, which also includes sustainability and economic optimizations to identify a plausible operating point for a large scale (a 14 m major radius) hydrogen production reactor dubbed HYPERION. Due to the potentially prohibitive capital cost (a $50 billion) and exorbitant thermal power (a 35 GWth) of HYPERION, we identify a conservative estimate for the minimum scale of a similar steady-state L-mode reactor of approximately 7.5 meters, half the size of HYPERION and only 20% larger than ITER. This minimum scale reactor would require an on-coil magnetic field of a 16 T and a blanket power density of ~ 5 MW/m 2 . It would produce 7 GWth of power with a power gain of 30, and it would operate far from all stability and confinement limits. To confirm the viability of this operating point, we perform various 1-D calculations. The crucial advantage of a steady-state (or fully non-inductive) reactor is that it is not limited by flux swing and can operate continuously, recharging its solenoid during operation. The crucial advantages of L-mode are that it avoids instabilities associated with edge localized modes (ELMs) and that it allows volumetric heating in the mantle due to the absence of a pedestal. Steady-state L-mode tokamak reactors could be the future of controlled fusion research and even play an important role in meeting the world's clean energy needs.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Mark Reed.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.B.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">70 p.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by 
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but 
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written 
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Physics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">A steady-state L-mode tokamak fusion reactor : large scale and minimum scale</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="a5d39b5f-1e71-470e-b3ba-79ecd6a96cfc">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>A steady-state L-mode tokamak fusion reactor : large scale and minimum scale&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2010&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Reed, Mark W. (Mark Wilbert)&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Physics.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>We perform extensive analysis on the physics of L-mode tokamak fusion reactors to identify (1) a favorable parameter space for a large scale steady-state reactor and (2) an operating point for a minimum scale steady-state reactor. The identification of the large scale parameter space is part of the 2008 MIT Nuclear Systems Design Project, which also includes sustainability and economic optimizations to identify a plausible operating point for a large scale (a 14 m major radius) hydrogen production reactor dubbed HYPERION. Due to the potentially prohibitive capital cost (a $50 billion) and exorbitant thermal power (a 35 GWth) of HYPERION, we identify a conservative estimate for the minimum scale of a similar steady-state L-mode reactor of approximately 7.5 meters, half the size of HYPERION and only 20% larger than ITER. This minimum scale reactor would require an on-coil magnetic field of a 16 T and a blanket power density of ~ 5 MW/m 2 . It would produce 7 GWth of power with a power gain of 30, and it would operate far from all stability and confinement limits. To confirm the viability of this operating point, we perform various 1-D calculations. The crucial advantage of a steady-state (or fully non-inductive) reactor is that it is not limited by flux swing and can operate continuously, recharging its solenoid during operation. The crucial advantages of L-mode are that it avoids instabilities associated with edge localized modes (ELMs) and that it allows volumetric heating in the mantle due to the absence of a pedestal. Steady-state L-mode tokamak reactors could be the future of controlled fusion research and even play an important role in meeting the world&amp;apos;s clean energy needs.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>