<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-21T14:11:27Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/58272" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/58272</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:42Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131022</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Edward S. Steinfeld.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Cunningham, Edward A., IV (Edward Albert)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Political Science.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="coverage" qualifier="spatial" lang="en_US">a-cc---</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2010-09-02T17:19:09Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2010-09-02T17:19:09Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2009</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2009</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/58272</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">625106095</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2009.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (p. 226-244).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">This study addresses the extent to which China's central state devolved ownership and investment levels in its energy sector to other actors during the modern reform period (1978- 2008). The project focused on China's coal and electric power industries, leveraging industry and government data, interviews, two firm case studies and a unique survey to measure policy, ownership and investment change over time. The results show that such devolution has been neither incrementally advancing nor consistently lacking, but has fluctuated according to the national electric power balance. The study suggests that China's central state actively manages the range of firms in the strategic coal and electric power industries as a dynamic portfolio of assets, resulting in such fluctuation. These findings run counter to what the dominant theories in the literature would otherwise predict. Neo-liberal theory would predict the incremental reduction of central state ownership in these sectors, as is evident in many of China's other sectors. Arguments predicated on the ability of the central state to sustain "self-reproducing authoritarianism" would predict fairly stable levels of central state investment and ownership in this strategic sector through time as well as quite limited liberalization. Finally, a theory privileging elite politics would indeed predict fluctuations, yet at different turning points in time than those found in this study, and without the sustained pattern that is evident in the extended time period under examination, which spans four distinct political eras.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">(cont.) This first implication of this study is that neo-liberal means can be deployed to achieve state-led ends. Second, the study provides evidence that such means of economic liberalization reform need not be cumulative and are, in fact, reversible. Third, the case studies reveal that firm decisions have a significant impact on the execution of these powerful broad central state policy changes that periodically reshape the structure of China's energy sector. Finally, this study also raises important implications relating to public policy, and in particular the ability of the Chinese state to fulfill aggressive greenhouse gas emission reductions in an effort to mitigate climate change.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Edward A. Cunningham, IV.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">Ph.D.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">244 p.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by 
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but 
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written 
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Political Science.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">A portfolio approach to energy governance : state management of China's coal and electric power supply industries</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" qualifier="alternative" lang="en_US">State management of China's coal and electric power supply industries</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="9c9418da-d4b2-4282-bfab-163e7a8d4e03">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>A portfolio approach to energy governance : state management of China&amp;apos;s coal and electric power supply industries&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;Subtitle>State management of China&amp;apos;s coal and electric power supply industries&lt;/Subtitle>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2009&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Cunningham, Edward A., IV (Edward Albert)&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Political Science.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>This study addresses the extent to which China&amp;apos;s central state devolved ownership and investment levels in its energy sector to other actors during the modern reform period (1978- 2008). The project focused on China&amp;apos;s coal and electric power industries, leveraging industry and government data, interviews, two firm case studies and a unique survey to measure policy, ownership and investment change over time. The results show that such devolution has been neither incrementally advancing nor consistently lacking, but has fluctuated according to the national electric power balance. The study suggests that China&amp;apos;s central state actively manages the range of firms in the strategic coal and electric power industries as a dynamic portfolio of assets, resulting in such fluctuation. These findings run counter to what the dominant theories in the literature would otherwise predict. Neo-liberal theory would predict the incremental reduction of central state ownership in these sectors, as is evident in many of China&amp;apos;s other sectors. Arguments predicated on the ability of the central state to sustain &amp;quot;self-reproducing authoritarianism&amp;quot; would predict fairly stable levels of central state investment and ownership in this strategic sector through time as well as quite limited liberalization. Finally, a theory privileging elite politics would indeed predict fluctuations, yet at different turning points in time than those found in this study, and without the sustained pattern that is evident in the extended time period under examination, which spans four distinct political eras.&lt;/Abstract>
   	&lt;Abstract>(cont.) This first implication of this study is that neo-liberal means can be deployed to achieve state-led ends. Second, the study provides evidence that such means of economic liberalization reform need not be cumulative and are, in fact, reversible. Third, the case studies reveal that firm decisions have a significant impact on the execution of these powerful broad central state policy changes that periodically reshape the structure of China&amp;apos;s energy sector. Finally, this study also raises important implications relating to public policy, and in particular the ability of the Chinese state to fulfill aggressive greenhouse gas emission reductions in an effort to mitigate climate change.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>