2026-09-20T10:19:35Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/597702022-01-13T07:54:44Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023
Karl Seidman.
Piercy, Brett I. (Brett Ianthe)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
2010-10-29T18:35:51Z
2010-10-29T18:35:51Z
2010
2010
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/59770
671236330
Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2010.
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 85).
Patterns in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) expenditures for economic development in selected states were analyzed to explore whether differences in economic development tools, policies and programs available at the state level influence the deployment of economic development tools at the local level, and if so, how. Though CDBG is a federal government program, because grant fund programming is largely at the discretion of local decision-makers, and consistent expenditure data is available for entitlement communities across the country.
by Brett I. Piercy.
S.M.
85 p.
eng
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
M.I.T. theses are protected by
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Urban Studies and Planning.
State and local economic development tools : how does the range of state-level economic development tools available to a locality influence the way local resources are deployed?
How does the range of state-level economic development tools available to a locality influence the way local resources are deployed?
Thesis
application/pdf
false
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="d31b37b2-dd81-4955-b5c1-4ad7b6fd5e81">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Language>eng</Language>
<Title>State and local economic development tools : how does the range of state-level economic development tools available to a locality influence the way local resources are deployed?</Title>
<Subtitle>How does the range of state-level economic development tools available to a locality influence the way local resources are deployed?</Subtitle>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>2010</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Piercy, Brett I. (Brett Ianthe)</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License>
<Keyword>Urban Studies and Planning.</Keyword>
<Abstract>Patterns in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) expenditures for economic development in selected states were analyzed to explore whether differences in economic development tools, policies and programs available at the state level influence the deployment of economic development tools at the local level, and if so, how. Though CDBG is a federal government program, because grant fund programming is largely at the discretion of local decision-makers, and consistent expenditure data is available for entitlement communities across the country.</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>