<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T06:49:14Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/60180" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/60180</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:29Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131022</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Ann M. Graybiel.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Thorn, Catherine A. (Catherine Ann), 1980-</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2010-12-06T17:34:24Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2010-12-06T17:34:24Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2010</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2010</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/60180</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">681908403</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2010.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">Parallel cortico-basal ganglia loops are thought to give rise to a diverse set of limbic, associative and motor functions, but little is known about how these loops operate and how their neural activities evolve during learning. To address these issues, single-unit activity was recorded simultaneously in dorsolateral (sensorimotor) and dorsomedial (associative) regions of the striatum as rats learned two versions of a conditional T-maze task. The results demonstrate that contrasting patterns of activity developed in these regions during task performance, and evolved with different training-related dynamics. Oscillatory activity is thought to enable memory storage and replay, and may encourage the efficient transmission of information between brain regions. In a second set of experiments, local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded simultaneously from the dorsal striatum and the CAl field of the hippocampus, as rats engaged in spontaneous and instructed behaviors in the T-maze. Two major findings are reported. First, striatal LFPs showed prominent theta-band rhythms that were strongly modulated during behavior. Second, striatal and hippocampal theta rhythms were modulated differently during T-maze performance, and in rats that successfully learned the task, became highly coherent during the choice period. To formalize the hypothesized contributions of dorsolateral and dorsomedial striatum during T-maze learning, a computational model was developed. This model localizes a model-free reinforcement learning (RL) system to the sensorimotor cortico-basal ganglia loop and localizes a model-based RL system to a network of structures including the associative cortico-basal ganglia loop and the hippocampus. Two models of dorsomedial striatal function were investigated, both of which can account for the patterns of activation observed during T-maze training. The two models make differing predictions regarding activation of the dorsomedial striatum following lesions of the model-free system, depending on whether it serves a direct role in action selection through participation in a model-based planning system or whether it participates in arbitrating between the model-free and model-based controllers. Combined, the work presented in this thesis shows that a large network of forebrain structures is engaged during procedural learning. The results suggest that coordination across regions may be required for successful learning and/or task performance, and that the different regions may contribute to behavioral performance by performing distinct RL computations.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Catherine Ann Thorn.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">Ph.D.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">191 p.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by 
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but 
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written 
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Simultaneous activation of multiple memory systems during learning : insights from electrophysiology and modeling</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="bf367b23-5932-4680-b972-a1b5877969b2">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Simultaneous activation of multiple memory systems during learning : insights from electrophysiology and modeling&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2010&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Thorn, Catherine A. (Catherine Ann), 1980-&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>Parallel cortico-basal ganglia loops are thought to give rise to a diverse set of limbic, associative and motor functions, but little is known about how these loops operate and how their neural activities evolve during learning. To address these issues, single-unit activity was recorded simultaneously in dorsolateral (sensorimotor) and dorsomedial (associative) regions of the striatum as rats learned two versions of a conditional T-maze task. The results demonstrate that contrasting patterns of activity developed in these regions during task performance, and evolved with different training-related dynamics. Oscillatory activity is thought to enable memory storage and replay, and may encourage the efficient transmission of information between brain regions. In a second set of experiments, local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded simultaneously from the dorsal striatum and the CAl field of the hippocampus, as rats engaged in spontaneous and instructed behaviors in the T-maze. Two major findings are reported. First, striatal LFPs showed prominent theta-band rhythms that were strongly modulated during behavior. Second, striatal and hippocampal theta rhythms were modulated differently during T-maze performance, and in rats that successfully learned the task, became highly coherent during the choice period. To formalize the hypothesized contributions of dorsolateral and dorsomedial striatum during T-maze learning, a computational model was developed. This model localizes a model-free reinforcement learning (RL) system to the sensorimotor cortico-basal ganglia loop and localizes a model-based RL system to a network of structures including the associative cortico-basal ganglia loop and the hippocampus. Two models of dorsomedial striatal function were investigated, both of which can account for the patterns of activation observed during T-maze training. The two models make differing predictions regarding activation of the dorsomedial striatum following lesions of the model-free system, depending on whether it serves a direct role in action selection through participation in a model-based planning system or whether it participates in arbitrating between the model-free and model-based controllers. Combined, the work presented in this thesis shows that a large network of forebrain structures is engaged during procedural learning. The results suggest that coordination across regions may be required for successful learning and/or task performance, and that the different regions may contribute to behavioral performance by performing distinct RL computations.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>