2026-09-19T20:23:26Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/615572022-01-13T07:54:12Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023
Ute Meta Bauer.
Ahmed, Haseeb Waqar
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
2011-03-07T15:14:34Z
2011-03-07T15:14:34Z
2010
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61557
703171985
Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2010.
"September 2010." Page 127 blank. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 125-126).
In the context of art to replicate is to re-create and transpose an architectural space that is geographically or historically remote in a chosen site in the present. The replica binds itself to the original and creates a register for continuity and change across vast expanses. The existent world is uzsed to produce its mirror image; those who see themselves in the original must confront their own image. In the practice of Replication an artist invests nearly all of her artistic freedom in a single decision: what should be reproduced in the present so that it may continue into the future? Together the Replicators proclaim 'The World has already been Made!' but what then delays utopia? In the last two years we have seen a massive upsurge in the use of replication as a strategy to produce meaning. Of these works I have chosen three: Yael Bartana's Wall and Tower (2009), Laurent Grasso's HAARP (2009), and Daniel G. Baird's Soyuz/ Progress (2008), that demonstrate a multiplicity of historical and technological concerns that are the inevitably object of replication. Replication belongs first and foremost to the scientific method as fact is only fact insofar as it can be reproduced anywhere in the world at any time.My contribution treats the technical institute of MIT as a site for the production of meaning instead of as a site for the production of reproducible technical knowledge. My works Shamshir+Windtunnel=Progress (2008-09), Daedalus: Holding Problem/Problem (2010), and the two part project The Sun Sets at Teufelsberg (2009) and Remote Viewing.: Teufelsberg (2010) seek to sustain and inhabit the space of translation between the original object and its replica. This thesis consists of in-depth studies of works by my contemporaries together with my own installations. Lastly I chart a path through art history beginning in 1968 that leads up to the development of the strategy of Replication in contemporary art in the present.
by Haseeb Waqar Ahmed.
S.M.
127 p.
eng
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
M.I.T. theses are protected by
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Architecture.
The Replicator : on the social destruction of fact through replication as art
On the social destruction of fact through replication as art
Thesis
application/pdf
false
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="15642fa5-c181-4cd5-a691-9e03d7374992">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Language>eng</Language>
<Title>The Replicator : on the social destruction of fact through replication as art</Title>
<Subtitle>On the social destruction of fact through replication as art</Subtitle>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>2010</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Ahmed, Haseeb Waqar</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License>
<Keyword>Architecture.</Keyword>
<Abstract>In the context of art to replicate is to re-create and transpose an architectural space that is geographically or historically remote in a chosen site in the present. The replica binds itself to the original and creates a register for continuity and change across vast expanses. The existent world is uzsed to produce its mirror image; those who see themselves in the original must confront their own image. In the practice of Replication an artist invests nearly all of her artistic freedom in a single decision: what should be reproduced in the present so that it may continue into the future? Together the Replicators proclaim 'The World has already been Made!' but what then delays utopia? In the last two years we have seen a massive upsurge in the use of replication as a strategy to produce meaning. Of these works I have chosen three: Yael Bartana's Wall and Tower (2009), Laurent Grasso's HAARP (2009), and Daniel G. Baird's Soyuz/ Progress (2008), that demonstrate a multiplicity of historical and technological concerns that are the inevitably object of replication. Replication belongs first and foremost to the scientific method as fact is only fact insofar as it can be reproduced anywhere in the world at any time.My contribution treats the technical institute of MIT as a site for the production of meaning instead of as a site for the production of reproducible technical knowledge. My works Shamshir+Windtunnel=Progress (2008-09), Daedalus: Holding Problem/Problem (2010), and the two part project The Sun Sets at Teufelsberg (2009) and Remote Viewing.: Teufelsberg (2010) seek to sustain and inhabit the space of translation between the original object and its replica. This thesis consists of in-depth studies of works by my contemporaries together with my own installations. Lastly I chart a path through art history beginning in 1968 that leads up to the development of the strategy of Replication in contemporary art in the present.</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>