<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T05:37:33Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/61906" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/61906</identifier><datestamp>2026-06-05T20:26:45Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131024</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Chryssostomos Chryssostomidis and Richard W. Kimball.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Laskos, Dimitrios</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2011-03-24T20:24:42Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2011-03-24T20:24:42Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2010</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2010</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61906</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">706827699</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (Nav. E. and S.M. in Mechanical Engineering)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, 2010.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (p. 87-89).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">Improvement of the propulsive efficiency of ships has always been one of the main objectives for naval architects and marine engineers. Contra-Rotating propellers (CRP) are propulsor configurations offering higher efficiency compared to conventional single propellers by recovering the rotational energy in the propeller slipstream. The application of this type of propulsive device to modern ships becomes even more attractive, considering the recent developments in electric propulsion and the increased emphasis on fuel economy. Propeller design codes are therefore expected to include CRP design capabilities. This thesis describes two methods for designing CRP in the context of lifting-line theory, along with a procedure for predicting the cavitation performance of conventional propellers and CRP. All of the above methods have been implemented numerically and integrated into a computer program developed in MATLAB®. Comparisons of numerical predictions of efficiency between single and contra-rotating propellers, which confirm the superiority of the latter are presented. Physical insight into the increased efficiency of CRP is also obtained by presenting results for the velocity fields induced by these propulsor configurations. In addition, the predicted cavitation patterns, observed on conventional and contra-rotating propellers operating in uniform and non-uniform wakes, show the advantage of CRP with respect to the occurrence of cavitation.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">Dimitrios Laskos.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">Nav.E.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M. in Mechanical Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">135 p.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by 
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but 
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written 
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Mechanical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Design and cavitation performance of contra-rotating propellers</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" qualifier="alternative" lang="en_US">Design and cavitation performance of CRPs</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" qualifier="alternative" lang="en_US">Contra-rotating propellers</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="e6bc5a2b-79d0-4475-a3b0-f9706db48aa1">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Design and cavitation performance of contra-rotating propellers&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;Subtitle>Design and cavitation performance of CRPs&lt;/Subtitle>
   	&lt;Subtitle>Contra-rotating propellers&lt;/Subtitle>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2010&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Laskos, Dimitrios&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Mechanical Engineering.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>Improvement of the propulsive efficiency of ships has always been one of the main objectives for naval architects and marine engineers. Contra-Rotating propellers (CRP) are propulsor configurations offering higher efficiency compared to conventional single propellers by recovering the rotational energy in the propeller slipstream. The application of this type of propulsive device to modern ships becomes even more attractive, considering the recent developments in electric propulsion and the increased emphasis on fuel economy. Propeller design codes are therefore expected to include CRP design capabilities. This thesis describes two methods for designing CRP in the context of lifting-line theory, along with a procedure for predicting the cavitation performance of conventional propellers and CRP. All of the above methods have been implemented numerically and integrated into a computer program developed in MATLAB®. Comparisons of numerical predictions of efficiency between single and contra-rotating propellers, which confirm the superiority of the latter are presented. Physical insight into the increased efficiency of CRP is also obtained by presenting results for the velocity fields induced by these propulsor configurations. In addition, the predicted cavitation patterns, observed on conventional and contra-rotating propellers operating in uniform and non-uniform wakes, show the advantage of CRP with respect to the occurrence of cavitation.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>