2026-09-18T20:48:02Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/628822022-01-13T07:54:12Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023
Andrew Scott.
Galletly, Adam Benjamin
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
2011-05-23T15:31:25Z
2011-05-23T15:31:25Z
2011
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/62882
722940852
Thesis (M. Arch.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2011.
This electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.
"February 2011." Cataloged from student submitted PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 120-121).
Recent affairs in Washington D.C. are beginning to lay the foundation for a new exploration of architecture. The division line between national and corporate identities, their spatial relationship to the public realm are beginning to blur. The expanding influence of private entities in public affairs necessitates and exploration of how public architecture is dealt with in responds to the needs of two distinctive user groups. In my proposed future for Washington D.C., this new influx of corporate influence in the American system of government will necessitate the investigation of the line of separation between government and private industry. This new entity of quasi-public, quasi-private distinction must instigate a rethinking of representation in terms of identity and in terms of spatial relationship in the public realm. As constructs of individuals, both government and private industry are, although differently, directly connected to the service of the public. A reevaluation of a mundane, yet extremely invaluable program that contributes to the diminishing of public influence can be the vessel through which to explore grater ideas about the transparency of the system and how the public is exposed to it. Examining the definition of a "public" building through the lens of it's intended users can reveal how transparency, both literal and phenomenological can be manipulated to expose a larger statement about public and private realms.
by Adam B. Galletly.
M.Arch.
121 p.
eng
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
M.I.T. theses are protected by
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Architecture.
My own, private Washington
Thesis
application/pdf
false
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="1ed40a37-63f5-4b52-933f-7d59cd0371bc">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Language>eng</Language>
<Title>My own, private Washington</Title>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>2011</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Galletly, Adam Benjamin</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License>
<Keyword>Architecture.</Keyword>
<Abstract>Recent affairs in Washington D.C. are beginning to lay the foundation for a new exploration of architecture. The division line between national and corporate identities, their spatial relationship to the public realm are beginning to blur. The expanding influence of private entities in public affairs necessitates and exploration of how public architecture is dealt with in responds to the needs of two distinctive user groups. In my proposed future for Washington D.C., this new influx of corporate influence in the American system of government will necessitate the investigation of the line of separation between government and private industry. This new entity of quasi-public, quasi-private distinction must instigate a rethinking of representation in terms of identity and in terms of spatial relationship in the public realm. As constructs of individuals, both government and private industry are, although differently, directly connected to the service of the public. A reevaluation of a mundane, yet extremely invaluable program that contributes to the diminishing of public influence can be the vessel through which to explore grater ideas about the transparency of the system and how the public is exposed to it. Examining the definition of a "public" building through the lens of it's intended users can reveal how transparency, both literal and phenomenological can be manipulated to expose a larger statement about public and private realms.</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>