2026-09-19T21:51:57Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request

oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/632332022-01-13T07:54:52Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023

Richard M. Locke. Hidalgo, Patrick (Patrick Francisco) Sloan School of Management. Sloan School of Management n-us--- nwcu--- 2011-06-06T17:44:29Z 2011-06-06T17:44:29Z 2010 2010 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/63233 726659135 Thesis (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2010. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references. There are a number of complex and seemingly intractable social problems facing the United States and the world today. Following the election of President Barack Obama in 2008, there was a renewed popular interest in organizing and movement building as effective means of effecting profound social change in the United States. This thesis explores whether organizing can be used to address social problems today, in addition to elections. Specifically, I try to tackle this question by analyzing two distinct and unrelated movements: climate change and the effort to open U.S.-Cuba policy. First, the basic organizing framework is introduced. Then, each case study is presented with an eye towards how the use of narrative, selfinterest, power, moral courage and strategy are being employed. The analysis sheds light on extensive interviews that were conducted with 20 leaders that are part, or have formed part, of these two movements, and focuses on the strategic challenges and opportunities facing a key protagonist in each case. Finally, the conclusion proposes that organizing can indeed make significant contributions to these specific social problems and offers suggestions for how each movement might incorporate key organizing principles into its work going forward. by Patrick Hidalgo. M.B.A. 119 p. eng Massachusetts Institute of Technology M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 Sloan School of Management. Analyzing the critical success factors for two distinct social movement case studies : climate change & the opening of U.S.-Cuba policy Analyzing two social movements for our times : the climate change struggle and the effort to further open U.S. policy towards Cuba Thesis application/pdf Publication unknown unknown <Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="29b13ea1-36a4-4bd2-93d3-6232033cfe8a"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>Analyzing the critical success factors for two distinct social movement case studies : climate change &amp; the opening of U.S.-Cuba policy</Title> <Subtitle>Analyzing two social movements for our times : the climate change struggle and the effort to further open U.S. policy towards Cuba</Subtitle> <PublishedIn> <Publication> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2010</PublicationDate> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Hidalgo, Patrick (Patrick Francisco)</DisplayName> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License> <Keyword>Sloan School of Management.</Keyword> <Abstract>There are a number of complex and seemingly intractable social problems facing the United States and the world today. Following the election of President Barack Obama in 2008, there was a renewed popular interest in organizing and movement building as effective means of effecting profound social change in the United States. This thesis explores whether organizing can be used to address social problems today, in addition to elections. Specifically, I try to tackle this question by analyzing two distinct and unrelated movements: climate change and the effort to open U.S.-Cuba policy. First, the basic organizing framework is introduced. Then, each case study is presented with an eye towards how the use of narrative, selfinterest, power, moral courage and strategy are being employed. The analysis sheds light on extensive interviews that were conducted with 20 leaders that are part, or have formed part, of these two movements, and focuses on the strategic challenges and opportunities facing a key protagonist in each case. Finally, the conclusion proposes that organizing can indeed make significant contributions to these specific social problems and offers suggestions for how each movement might incorporate key organizing principles into its work going forward.</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication>