<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T16:19:48Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/65170" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/65170</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:11Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Charles M. Oman and Kevin R. Duda.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Hainley, Christopher James, Jr</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2011-08-16T15:24:49Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2011-08-16T15:24:49Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2011</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2011</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/65170</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">745027398</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">This electronic version was submitted by the student author.  The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (p. 103-114).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">The ability of operators to "gracefully transition" (maintaining control and awareness of the system without excessive workload or decrements in flight performance) between levels of automation (LOA) in several case studies and in a simulated lunar landing was investigated in anticipation of future lunar missions. Endsley's situation awareness model (extended to apply to supervisory control systems) and the Sheridan/Verplank and Proud/Hart LOA scales were used to analyze six maritime, aviation, and aerospace case studies and formulate design guidelines for enhancing mode transitions. These motivated an experiment in which thirteen subjects with flight simulator experience flew 24 approach trajectories (half including a landing point redesignation) that transitioned from a fully automatic flight control mode to either: pitch rate-control/attitude hold (RC/AH) with automatic rate-of-descent (ROD), roll-pitch-yaw (RPY) RC/AH with automatic ROD, or RPY RC/AH with incremental ROD. Subjective and objective workloads were measured using a Modified Bedford Scale and secondary task response time, respectively. A tertiary task - verbal callouts of altitude, fuel, and location, provided a measure of pilot situation awareness. Flight performance was evaluated using the pitch axis tracking error. Friedman pairwise tests demonstrated that secondary task response time significantly increased following the mode transition. Subjects' workload ratings, when ranked, showed unanimous agreement that workload was lowest prior to the transition, and highest during. The accuracy of the situation awareness verbal callouts decreased significantly after the transition. The immediate effect of redesignation was statistically concordant across subjects. Pitch axis tracking mean square error following a mode transition was greater in trials with redesignations (p = 0.0005), and increased consistently with control mode difficulty (p = 0.025) in runs with no redesignation, but not in runs with redesignations. Using callouts to assess the dynamics of situation awareness is a novel technique. Dramatic changes in subjective and objective workload and situation awareness occur after mode transitions, depending on control mode difficulty, that have an apparently reciprocal relationship. The case studies and experimental results suggested a dozen guidelines for design of supervisory control systems intended to promote transition gracefulness.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Christopher James Hainley, Jr.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">383, [6] p.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="relation" qualifier="requires" lang="en_US">CD-ROM contains copy of thesis in .PDF format.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by 
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but 
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written 
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Aeronautics and Astronautics.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Lunar landing : dynamic operator interaction with multi-modal automation systems</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" qualifier="alternative" lang="en_US">Dynamic operator interaction with multi-modal automation systems</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="eb3d6c00-8645-43f6-a2d6-8b4612ede62d">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Lunar landing : dynamic operator interaction with multi-modal automation systems&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;Subtitle>Dynamic operator interaction with multi-modal automation systems&lt;/Subtitle>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2011&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Hainley, Christopher James, Jr&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Aeronautics and Astronautics.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>The ability of operators to &amp;quot;gracefully transition&amp;quot; (maintaining control and awareness of the system without excessive workload or decrements in flight performance) between levels of automation (LOA) in several case studies and in a simulated lunar landing was investigated in anticipation of future lunar missions. Endsley&amp;apos;s situation awareness model (extended to apply to supervisory control systems) and the Sheridan/Verplank and Proud/Hart LOA scales were used to analyze six maritime, aviation, and aerospace case studies and formulate design guidelines for enhancing mode transitions. These motivated an experiment in which thirteen subjects with flight simulator experience flew 24 approach trajectories (half including a landing point redesignation) that transitioned from a fully automatic flight control mode to either: pitch rate-control/attitude hold (RC/AH) with automatic rate-of-descent (ROD), roll-pitch-yaw (RPY) RC/AH with automatic ROD, or RPY RC/AH with incremental ROD. Subjective and objective workloads were measured using a Modified Bedford Scale and secondary task response time, respectively. A tertiary task - verbal callouts of altitude, fuel, and location, provided a measure of pilot situation awareness. Flight performance was evaluated using the pitch axis tracking error. Friedman pairwise tests demonstrated that secondary task response time significantly increased following the mode transition. Subjects&amp;apos; workload ratings, when ranked, showed unanimous agreement that workload was lowest prior to the transition, and highest during. The accuracy of the situation awareness verbal callouts decreased significantly after the transition. The immediate effect of redesignation was statistically concordant across subjects. Pitch axis tracking mean square error following a mode transition was greater in trials with redesignations (p = 0.0005), and increased consistently with control mode difficulty (p = 0.025) in runs with no redesignation, but not in runs with redesignations. Using callouts to assess the dynamics of situation awareness is a novel technique. Dramatic changes in subjective and objective workload and situation awareness occur after mode transitions, depending on control mode difficulty, that have an apparently reciprocal relationship. The case studies and experimental results suggested a dozen guidelines for design of supervisory control systems intended to promote transition gracefulness.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>