2026-09-19T04:44:57Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/676112022-01-13T07:54:36Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023
Ahmed Ghoniem.
Chapman, Alex J. (Alex Jacob)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
2011-12-09T21:32:19Z
2011-12-09T21:32:19Z
2011
2011
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/67611
765399806
Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, 2011.
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 88-90).
There has been much effort to characterize and model coal for use in combustion and gasification. This work seeks to delineate the differences and similarities between biomass and coal, with emphasis on the state of the art in biomass pyrolysis/devolatilization modeling. An existing coal Entrained Flow Gasification (EFG) Reduced Order Model (ROM) was expanded to more accurately simulate the gasification of a mixed feedstock of biomass and coal. The GE 2700tpd gasifier was used because it is a widely used technology. The characteristics and state of the art in biomass conversion models were applied in the expanded ROM to model coal-biomass mixture gasification. Biomass has higher oxygen content and lower fixed carbon content than coal. Therefore, as results show, increasing the mass fraction of wood leads to a rise in temperature and drop in syngas heating value and Cold Gas Efficiency (CGE). The oxygen feed stream must be adjusted downward to maintain a constant temperature. Temperature change has the strongest effect on ash slag (lesser viscosity and thickness) while ash composition has a very small effect (greater viscosity and thickness).
by Alex J. Chapman.
S.M.
90 p.
eng
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
M.I.T. theses are protected by
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Mechanical Engineering.
Biomass characterization and reduced order modeling of mixed-feedstock gasification
Thesis
application/pdf
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="ca33b8b9-4dfe-434e-a26f-6b1a93f04024">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Language>eng</Language>
<Title>Biomass characterization and reduced order modeling of mixed-feedstock gasification</Title>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>2011</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Chapman, Alex J. (Alex Jacob)</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License>
<Keyword>Mechanical Engineering.</Keyword>
<Abstract>There has been much effort to characterize and model coal for use in combustion and gasification. This work seeks to delineate the differences and similarities between biomass and coal, with emphasis on the state of the art in biomass pyrolysis/devolatilization modeling. An existing coal Entrained Flow Gasification (EFG) Reduced Order Model (ROM) was expanded to more accurately simulate the gasification of a mixed feedstock of biomass and coal. The GE 2700tpd gasifier was used because it is a widely used technology. The characteristics and state of the art in biomass conversion models were applied in the expanded ROM to model coal-biomass mixture gasification. Biomass has higher oxygen content and lower fixed carbon content than coal. Therefore, as results show, increasing the mass fraction of wood leads to a rise in temperature and drop in syngas heating value and Cold Gas Efficiency (CGE). The oxygen feed stream must be adjusted downward to maintain a constant temperature. Temperature change has the strongest effect on ash slag (lesser viscosity and thickness) while ash composition has a very small effect (greater viscosity and thickness).</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>