<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-21T01:04:13Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/68377" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/68377</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:44Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Eric Klopfer.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Lo, Monique (Monique Chun-Ying), 1978-</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2012-01-12T19:22:32Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2012-01-12T19:22:32Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2001</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2001</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68377</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">50336422</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2001.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (leaf 46).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">Antibiotic-resistant bacteria pose a serious threat to immuno-compromised individuals in Intensive Care Units (ICU). This study examines several cycling treatments (7,14,30,60,120,240-day cycle) and random fraction treatment (50-50,60-40,80-20,100-0) strategies in ICU and finds that no single strategy will outperform all others. Human, hospital and pathogen conditions such as admission/departure rate, transmission rate, drug application rate, and incoming patients' characteristics influence the selection of the optimal treatment strategy. Random fraction treatment is generally favored when admission/departure rate is large. Cycling treatment is generally favored when admission/departure rate is small. When transmission rates are high, longer cycle period are preferred. When transmission rates are low, random fraction treatments are preferred. For cycling treatments, longer cycle periods is associated with lower drug application rates whereas shorter cycle periods are associated with larger drug application rates.Antibiotic-resistant bacteria pose a serious threat to immuno-compromised individuals in Intensive Care Units (ICU). This study examines several cycling treatments (7,14,30,60,120,240-day cycle) and random fraction treatment (50-50,60-40,80-20,100-0) strategies in ICU and finds that no single strategy will outperform all others. Human, hospital and pathogen conditions such as admission/departure rate, transmission rate, drug application rate, and incoming patients' characteristics influence the selection of the optimal treatment strategy. Random fraction treatment is generally favored when admission/departure rate is large. Cycling treatment is generally favored when admission/departure rate is small. When transmission rates are high, longer cycle period are preferred. When transmission rates are low, random fraction treatments are preferred. For cycling treatments, longer cycle periods is associated with lower drug application rates whereas shorter cycle periods are associated with larger drug application rates.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Monique Lo.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">M.C.P.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">54 leaves</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by &#xd;
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but &#xd;
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written &#xd;
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Urban Studies and Planning.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Modeling and study of infectious disease : stochastic modeling for antibiotic resistance and treatment strategies</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="fb9cbe5c-1f2f-4a96-b969-1db6923e8cfb">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Modeling and study of infectious disease : stochastic modeling for antibiotic resistance and treatment strategies&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2001&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Lo, Monique (Monique Chun-Ying), 1978-&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword&gt;Urban Studies and Planning.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>Antibiotic-resistant bacteria pose a serious threat to immuno-compromised individuals in Intensive Care Units (ICU). This study examines several cycling treatments (7,14,30,60,120,240-day cycle) and random fraction treatment (50-50,60-40,80-20,100-0) strategies in ICU and finds that no single strategy will outperform all others. Human, hospital and pathogen conditions such as admission/departure rate, transmission rate, drug application rate, and incoming patients&amp;apos; characteristics influence the selection of the optimal treatment strategy. Random fraction treatment is generally favored when admission/departure rate is large. Cycling treatment is generally favored when admission/departure rate is small. When transmission rates are high, longer cycle period are preferred. When transmission rates are low, random fraction treatments are preferred. For cycling treatments, longer cycle periods is associated with lower drug application rates whereas shorter cycle periods are associated with larger drug application rates.Antibiotic-resistant bacteria pose a serious threat to immuno-compromised individuals in Intensive Care Units (ICU). This study examines several cycling treatments (7,14,30,60,120,240-day cycle) and random fraction treatment (50-50,60-40,80-20,100-0) strategies in ICU and finds that no single strategy will outperform all others. Human, hospital and pathogen conditions such as admission/departure rate, transmission rate, drug application rate, and incoming patients&amp;apos; characteristics influence the selection of the optimal treatment strategy. Random fraction treatment is generally favored when admission/departure rate is large. Cycling treatment is generally favored when admission/departure rate is small. When transmission rates are high, longer cycle period are preferred. When transmission rates are low, random fraction treatments are preferred. For cycling treatments, longer cycle periods is associated with lower drug application rates whereas shorter cycle periods are associated with larger drug application rates.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>