2026-09-20T17:12:24Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/723352022-01-19T18:05:08Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023
Roland B. Greeley.
Bowers, James Myron
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of City and Regional Planning.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of City and Regional Planning
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
n-usc-- n-cn-bc
2012-08-24T14:58:50Z
2012-08-24T14:58:50Z
1961
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/72335
06249403
Thesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of City and Regional Planning, 1961.
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 171-178).
In examining the present status of water resource planning in the Pacific Northwest, numerous critical inadequacies become readily apparent. One method of minimizing some of these inadequacies is through administrative reorganization. Realizing this there have been many different reorganization proposals put forth. Along with these proposals has come much propaganda. In order to obtain a clearer picture comparative criteria were established. Upon doing this it was decided to limit the analysis to the compact, the authority and the inter-agency approaches. Upon applying the criteria to these three structures, the following conclusions were reached: 1) the compact would probably be worse than the existing setup, 2) the inter-agency committee has some value and not too many dangers, 3) the authority fulfills by far the most criteria but because of certain possible dangers should not be strived for, 4) that the criteria are useful in discovering which structures may be unacceptable but they do not tell which is the optimum one. Much is dependent upon the type of planners the structures attract.
by James Myron Bowers.
M.C.P.
178 leaves (1 folded)
eng
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
M.I.T. theses are protected by
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
City and Regional Planning.
HD1695.P2 B6
Water resources development Northwest, Pacific
Regional planning Northwest, Pacific
Criteria for an effective water resource planning process
Thesis
application/pdf
false
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="26c40493-7d7a-4594-bb62-6bff29d41b2c">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Language>eng</Language>
<Title>Criteria for an effective water resource planning process</Title>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>1961</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Bowers, James Myron</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License>
<Keyword>City and Regional Planning.</Keyword>
<Abstract>In examining the present status of water resource planning in the Pacific Northwest, numerous critical inadequacies become readily apparent. One method of minimizing some of these inadequacies is through administrative reorganization. Realizing this there have been many different reorganization proposals put forth. Along with these proposals has come much propaganda. In order to obtain a clearer picture comparative criteria were established. Upon doing this it was decided to limit the analysis to the compact, the authority and the inter-agency approaches. Upon applying the criteria to these three structures, the following conclusions were reached: 1) the compact would probably be worse than the existing setup, 2) the inter-agency committee has some value and not too many dangers, 3) the authority fulfills by far the most criteria but because of certain possible dangers should not be strived for, 4) that the criteria are useful in discovering which structures may be unacceptable but they do not tell which is the optimum one. Much is dependent upon the type of planners the structures attract.</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>