<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T21:22:17Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/72624" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/72624</identifier><datestamp>2026-06-06T01:04:56Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Ute Meta Bauer.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Berzofsky, Scott (Scott A.)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2012-09-11T17:27:14Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2012-09-11T17:27:14Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2012</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/72624</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">805952205</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (S.M. in Art, Culture and Technology)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2012.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">This electronic version was submitted by the student author.  The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">"June 2012." Cataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (p. 59-60).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">How can artistic/activist practices respond to urban conditions of exclusion and inequality? Since the 1970s, urban redevelopment in the United States has been dominated by a neoliberal ideology that promotes privatization, deregulation and the withdrawal of the state from the provision of social services. As a result, urban resources such as public space, affordable housing, health care, food and education are increasingly transformed into private property. Against the neoliberal privatization of resources in the city, my work is dedicated to reclaiming public spaces and building relationships based on cooperation, solidarity and sharing resources in common. This thesis attempts to situate my practice as an artist and activist within a broader historical and theoretical framework. Part 1 defines the seemingly archaic terms "enclosure" and "the commons." Parts 2 and 3 update these terms for the twenty-first century, addressing the "new enclosures" of neoliberalism and the emergence of the alterglobalization movement. In parts 4 and 5, I describe the conditions of the neoliberal city and examine a specific case study in East Baltimore. Part 6 introduces the concept of "the right to the city." Part 7 presents an overview of my own formation as an artist and activist committed to the project of reclaiming the commons. Finally, in part 8, I reflect on the first phase of the Occupy movement and consider its potential to reconfigure the boundaries between art, politics, urbanism and everyday life.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Scott Berzofsky.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M. in Art, Culture and Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">69 p.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by 
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but 
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written 
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Architecture.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Reclaiming the commons : art and activism in the neoliberal city</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="0f67cda1-11d1-47ad-8500-05f1046aa123">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Reclaiming the commons : art and activism in the neoliberal city&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2012&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Berzofsky, Scott (Scott A.)&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Architecture.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>How can artistic/activist practices respond to urban conditions of exclusion and inequality? Since the 1970s, urban redevelopment in the United States has been dominated by a neoliberal ideology that promotes privatization, deregulation and the withdrawal of the state from the provision of social services. As a result, urban resources such as public space, affordable housing, health care, food and education are increasingly transformed into private property. Against the neoliberal privatization of resources in the city, my work is dedicated to reclaiming public spaces and building relationships based on cooperation, solidarity and sharing resources in common. This thesis attempts to situate my practice as an artist and activist within a broader historical and theoretical framework. Part 1 defines the seemingly archaic terms &amp;quot;enclosure&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;the commons.&amp;quot; Parts 2 and 3 update these terms for the twenty-first century, addressing the &amp;quot;new enclosures&amp;quot; of neoliberalism and the emergence of the alterglobalization movement. In parts 4 and 5, I describe the conditions of the neoliberal city and examine a specific case study in East Baltimore. Part 6 introduces the concept of &amp;quot;the right to the city.&amp;quot; Part 7 presents an overview of my own formation as an artist and activist committed to the project of reclaiming the commons. Finally, in part 8, I reflect on the first phase of the Occupy movement and consider its potential to reconfigure the boundaries between art, politics, urbanism and everyday life.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>